Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around January 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Beachside Nursing Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with a Stage 3 sacrococcygeal pressure injury requiring daily wound care did not have Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) signage or a PPE cart at the room entrance, despite facility policy identifying residents with chronic wounds as candidates for EBP. During an observed wound care procedure, an LVN and a CNA performed and assisted with care without wearing gowns, contrary to policy requiring gowns and gloves for high-contact tasks. Both staff members acknowledged not using gowns, citing the absence of EBP signage and their belief that gowns were only needed for certain types of wounds, while the infection prevention leader later confirmed that EBP signage, PPE availability, and gown use should have been in place.
A resident admitted with a documented diagnosis of post-status cardiac pacemaker placement did not have a corresponding problem or interventions included in the care plan. Review of the care plan for the relevant period showed no entry addressing the pacemaker, and the DON confirmed during interview and record review that the device and its related needs were not care planned, creating a risk that appropriate treatment and services for the pacemaker would not be provided.
Surveyors found that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate clinical records for several residents. For one resident who died, staff described detailed assessments and observations around the time of death, but these were not documented in the chart, nor were the names and titles of staff involved. Another resident with dysphagia and a GT was ordered NPO, yet physician orders and the MAR listed several medications as given by mouth instead of via GT, despite staff stating all medications were administered through the tube. A third resident’s treatment and monitoring orders for antifungal cream and a low air loss mattress had multiple PM shifts on the TAR left blank, with no initials or codes to show whether care was provided. For a discharged resident, the IDT care plan review form was missing numerous required entries, including participation, team member names, advance directive details, discharge planning information, and signatures or indications of agreement, and there was no set of vital signs documented at the time of discharge even though the discharge note stated the resident left with stable vital signs.
Surveyors identified multiple failures in food safety and sanitation, including improperly stored and unlabeled food items, unsanitary kitchen equipment, and maintenance issues such as a missing tile and rusted surfaces. These deficiencies were confirmed by staff and affected nearly all residents receiving dietary services.
Two residents did not receive care and services according to physician orders and facility policy. One resident with memory impairment was repeatedly served meals in bed despite an order to be up in a chair, and staff confirmed the order was not followed. Another cognitively impaired resident wore a wander-monitoring bracelet for elopement prevention, but there was no physician order or care plan in place for its use, as confirmed by staff and record review.
Three residents experienced significant unplanned weight loss due to the facility's failure to follow RD recommendations, notify physicians and representatives, and update care plans. One resident's severe weight loss was not communicated to the physician, another's nutritional status was not reassessed or addressed by the IDT, and a third resident's meal refusals and intake were not properly documented or care planned. The DON and staff confirmed these deficiencies and missing documentation.
A resident receiving enteral feeding via gastrostomy tube did not have tube placement verified prior to the start of feeding, as required by facility policy and physician orders. An RN initiated the feeding without performing the necessary placement check, and later confirmed this omission. The DON acknowledged the deficiency.
Two residents did not receive proper respiratory care as required by physician orders and facility policy. One resident's oxygen was not administered as ordered, with the nasal cannula disconnected and oxygen saturation below the target level until corrected by staff. Another resident's nasal cannula tubing was not dated and lacked a storage bag, contrary to policy, with staff confirming these omissions.
A nurse failed to follow physician orders during medication administration for two residents, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.41%. One resident received metformin without food, contrary to the order to administer with meals, and another was given Advil for severe pain when it was only prescribed for mild to moderate pain. Both residents were cognitively intact, and the errors were confirmed by the nurse.
Surveyors found that medication carts and the medication storage room were not maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, with expired medications not disposed of and oral, rectal, and external medications stored together. Nursing staff and the DON acknowledged these deficiencies, which were not in accordance with facility policy.
Staff did not follow recipes or physician diet orders, resulting in residents receiving incorrect food textures and portion sizes. Some residents were served chopped instead of regular textured diets due to insufficient food preparation, and others received incorrect portion sizes because meal cards were not properly checked. These issues were confirmed by staff and administration.
The facility did not ensure complete and accurate medical record documentation for two residents, including missing documentation of advance directive discussions on a POLST form for a resident with moderate cognitive impairment, and lack of recorded monitoring for a peripheral IV site during antibiotic therapy for another resident. These deficiencies were confirmed by facility staff.
A resident receiving hospice care did not have the hospice care team included in an IDT meeting following a significant change in condition, despite facility policy and hospice contract requirements for collaborative care planning. Facility staff confirmed the omission and acknowledged the need for hospice participation to ensure coordinated care.
Staff failed to follow infection control protocols by not performing hand hygiene before and after resident contact, during medication administration, and when moving between residents. An OTA and two LVNs were observed not washing hands or changing gloves as required, despite facility policies mandating these practices to prevent infection transmission.
Essential kitchen equipment, including the ice machine and low temperature dishwasher, was not maintained in a clean and safe condition, with observed residue, missing parts, and improper chlorine levels. Additionally, required temperature monitoring of the residents' dining room refrigerator was not consistently performed or documented according to facility policy.
A resident was not treated with dignity during a Foley catheter removal as multiple staff were present without permission, including male staff, causing the resident distress. Additionally, the resident's medications were administered late, affecting her ability to participate in physical therapy. The DON acknowledged these deficiencies.
A resident with multiple health conditions did not receive her scheduled 0900 medications until 1030, contrary to the facility's policy of administering medications within one hour of the prescribed time. This delay was confirmed by the resident, LVN, and through a review of the MAR and Medication Admin Audit Report.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions and PPE Use During Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to implement its infection prevention and control policies related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with a significant pressure injury. The facility’s infection prevention policy identified residents with chronic wounds as candidates for EBP and required gowns and gloves for high-contact care tasks. Resident 3 was cognitively intact and had a Stage 3 pressure injury to the sacrococcyx extending to both buttocks, with a physician’s order for daily wound care including cleansing, application of Venelex ointment, and dressing with foam and dry dressing. During observation on 4/29/26, there was no EBP signage or PPE cart at the entrance to this resident’s room. LVN 1, who acknowledged the resident’s Stage 3 pressure injury, stated there was no EBP signage because the resident had no chronic wound or catheter and indicated that the admission nurse was responsible for placing EBP signage. During the observed wound care for this resident, LVN 1 and CNA 1 did not wear gowns while performing and assisting with the wound care procedure. LVN 1 acknowledged not wearing a gown and stated that gowns were only needed if a resident had a chronic wound, defining a chronic wound as one that was non-healing or worsening. CNA 1 also confirmed not wearing a gown and explained that she used a gown only when EBP signage and a PPE cart were present at the resident’s door, which were absent in this case. The Director of Staff Development/Infection Preventionist later acknowledged that EBP signage and a PPE cart should have been present for this resident and that staff should have worn gowns during the wound care due to the potential for body fluid exposure. The DON was informed of and acknowledged these findings.
Failure to Care Plan for Resident with Cardiac Pacemaker
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a care plan that reflected an individual resident’s needs related to a cardiac pacemaker. A resident was admitted with a diagnosis of post-status cardiac pacemaker placement, as documented in the acute care hospitalist history and physical examination dated 3/25/26. Review of the resident’s Care Plan Report covering 3/29–4/1/26 showed no care plan problem was initiated to address the presence and management of the pacemaker. During a concurrent interview and closed medical record review on 4/16/26, the DON verified that the care plan did not include the resident’s pacemaker, resulting in a failure to ensure the care plan addressed this specific medical device and associated needs. This failure posed the risk of the resident not receiving the appropriate treatment and services related to the pacemaker.
Incomplete and Inaccurate Clinical Documentation for Multiple Residents
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with its own policies and accepted professional standards for multiple residents, including one who died in the facility and others with active and closed records. For one deceased resident, the record contained only brief progress notes indicating the time of death, confirmation by two licensed nurses, notification of family and administration, and completion of postmortem care. The record did not include documentation of the detailed observations, assessments, vital signs, interventions, or changes in condition surrounding the resident’s death, nor did it identify the names and titles of staff who performed these assessments and interventions. In interview, the LVN assigned to the resident at the time of death described specific assessment actions she took when notified the resident was unresponsive, including checking for a carotid pulse, observing for respirations, and attempting to obtain an oxygen saturation reading, and confirmed that all such observations and staff identities should have been documented but were not. The DON also verified that these elements should have been recorded to provide an accurate and complete account of the resident’s condition. For another resident with dysphagia and a gastrostomy tube (GT) who was ordered NPO, the physician’s orders in the medical record specified that several medications (famotidine, ferrous sulfate, and acetaminophen) were to be administered by mouth. The MAR for the month showed these medications were documented as given via the oral route on multiple occasions. In interview, an LVN stated that this resident was NPO and received all medications via GT, and acknowledged that the ordered route should have been changed to reflect the actual route of administration. The DON was informed and acknowledged that the orders and documentation did not accurately reflect the care being provided. For a third resident, the facility failed to document wound treatment and monitoring as ordered. The physician’s orders included application of antifungal cream 2% to the perineal area every shift and monitoring of a low air loss mattress every shift. Review of the TAR showed multiple PM shifts on which there were no nurse initials or codes to indicate whether the antifungal treatment or mattress monitoring had been completed or, if not, why they were not completed. An LVN reviewed the record and verified these blanks. The Administrator and DON were informed and acknowledged these missing entries. For another discharged resident, the facility failed to complete and accurately document the IDT Care Plan Review and to record vital signs at the time of discharge as required by policy. The IDT Care Plan Review form for this resident’s baseline care plan meeting was missing multiple required elements, including whether the resident participated in care plan development, any explanation if the resident did not participate, the names of social services, activities, and attending physician, verification of admission record information, documentation of advance directive choices, additional comments, the social services plan of care, the summary of the discharge plan, and documentation that the resident or representative had been notified of their rights and agreed with the plan of care. It also lacked documentation of whether the physician or healthcare practitioner participated in and agreed with the care plan review. The SSD and DON both stated they attended the IDT meeting but could not recall details and verified the missing information on the form. Additionally, although the record contained earlier vital signs and a discharge note stating the resident was discharged with stable vital signs, there was no documented set of vital signs obtained just prior to discharge to show the resident’s medical status at that time. An RN confirmed that vital signs should have been taken at discharge, and the DON stated that the expectation was for nurses to obtain vital signs just prior to discharge.
Food Safety and Sanitation Deficiencies in Dietary Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to food safety and sanitation guidelines as evidenced by improper storage, labeling, and maintenance of food items, as well as unsanitary kitchen equipment and conditions. Observations included pumpkin pies and bagels lacking expiration dates, a box of tater tots placed directly on the floor before being returned to the freezer, and a bottle of buttermilk ranch without an opened or expiration date. Additional findings included a bread knife with a melted handle, a missing tile on the drain near the ice maker, and a vent above the stove with a grey web-like formation. Several bread products were found with expired or missing dates, and staff confirmed these items should have been discarded or properly labeled. Further inspection revealed unsanitary kitchen equipment, such as pans with sticky residue and discoloration, a can opener with brown residue, and sticky stains on the floor between beverage machines. A melted and discolored pole with rust was also observed beneath the dish drying table. Staff interviews confirmed these findings and acknowledged the need for proper cleaning and maintenance. These deficiencies affected 57 of 59 residents who received dietary services from the facility's kitchen.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders and Develop Care Plans for Resident Safety Devices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary care and services as ordered for two residents. For one resident with impaired memory, there was a physician's order specifying that the resident should be up in a chair for all meals. Despite this, multiple observations over several days showed the resident eating breakfast in bed, and staff interviews confirmed awareness of the order but did not consistently follow it. The resident indicated a preference to be in the wheelchair during meals, and staff acknowledged the importance of this positioning, particularly to help prevent aspiration, as the resident's bed could not be elevated to 90 degrees. For another resident with cognitive impairment, a wander-monitoring bracelet was in use for elopement prevention. However, the facility did not obtain a physician's order or develop a care plan for the use of the wander guard, as required by facility policy. Staff interviews and record reviews confirmed the absence of necessary documentation, including informed consent and a care plan, despite the resident wearing the device since admission.
Failure to Address and Manage Significant Resident Weight Loss and Nutritional Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate nutritional services to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for three residents experiencing significant weight loss. For one resident with moderate cognitive impairment, there was a severe weight loss of 15 lbs in seven days. The Registered Dietitian (RD) recommended dietary fortification, but there was no documentation that these recommendations were communicated to the physician or addressed by the Nutrition Interdisciplinary Team (IDT). The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the physician was not notified and no follow-up occurred regarding the resident's weight loss. Another resident, who was cognitively intact and receiving enteral nutrition, experienced an unplanned severe weight loss of 16 lbs (8.33%) in 21 days. The RD and IDT did not analyze or implement necessary interventions in response to this weight loss, and there was no evidence that the physician or the resident and/or their representative were notified. The care plan was not revised to address the significant weight loss, despite facility policy requiring such actions. Both the RD and DON verified the lack of evaluation, notification, and care plan updates for this resident. A third resident, with multiple comorbidities including CHF, diabetes, and CKD, had issues with meal refusal and missing documentation regarding food and fluid intake. The resident's weight upon admission was not accurately recorded, and there was no care plan developed to address the refusal of meals. Multiple instances of missing documentation for meal and fluid intake were identified, and staff confirmed that no care plan was initiated for the resident's meal refusals. The DON acknowledged that the facility failed to record the resident's weight at admission and verified the missing documentation.
Failure to Verify GT Placement Prior to Enteral Feeding
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a gastrostomy tube (GT) placement check was performed prior to initiating enteral feeding for a resident receiving tube feeding. According to the facility's policies and procedures, staff are required to verify tube placement before each feeding and medication administration by observing tube length, checking for respiratory distress, auscultating for a whooshing sound after injecting air, and checking the pH of aspirate. Physician orders for the resident also specified that tube placement and patency must be checked before and after giving medications and before starting tube feeding. On the day of the incident, a resident was observed in bed with the enteral feeding equipment connected but turned off. A registered nurse (RN) entered the room, primed and connected the enteral feeding tube, and started the feeding without checking the GT placement as required. The RN later confirmed that he did not verify the tube's placement before starting the feeding, acknowledging that this step should have been completed. The Director of Nursing (DON) was informed and acknowledged the findings.
Failure to Provide Safe and Appropriate Respiratory Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care and services for two residents requiring oxygen therapy. For one resident, a physician's order specified continuous oxygen administration at two liters per minute via nasal cannula to maintain oxygen saturation above 90%. However, the resident was observed lying in bed with the oxygen set at 3.5 liters per minute, but the nasal cannula was not connected to the resident or the oxygen machine. The resident's oxygen saturation was found to be 86%, below the normal range, until the nasal cannula was properly applied and the oxygen flow adjusted to the ordered rate, resulting in improved saturation. For another resident with a diagnosis of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, the facility failed to ensure that the nasal cannula tubing was dated and that a storage bag was provided for the tubing when not in use, as required by facility policy. The nasal cannula was observed to be undated and no storage bag was present. Staff confirmed that the required dating and storage procedures had not been followed for this resident.
Medication Error Rate Exceeds Acceptable Threshold Due to Improper Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5%, with an observed rate of 7.41%. During medication administration, a nurse did not follow physician orders for two residents. For one resident, metformin, which was ordered to be given with meals, was administered without food or a meal present. The nurse confirmed that the medication was not given as prescribed. The resident was cognitively intact, as indicated by a BIMS score of 13, and had an active order specifying the medication should be taken with meals for diabetes management. In another instance, the same nurse administered Advil (ibuprofen) to a resident who reported a pain level of 8, despite the physician's order specifying the medication was to be given only for mild to moderate pain (pain level 4-6). The nurse verified that the medication was given outside the prescribed pain level parameters. This resident was also cognitively intact, with a BIMS score of 15. These actions were not in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures for safe and timely medication administration as prescribed.
Medication Storage, Labeling, and Disposal Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper storage, labeling, and disposal of medications as required by professional standards and its own policies. During inspections of two medication carts, surveyors observed that both carts were not maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, with visible dried residues and sticky medication build-up. Additionally, an expired bottle of Glucosamine Chondroitin Complex was found in one cart and had not been disposed of as required. These findings were verified by the licensed nursing staff present during the inspections. Further inspection of the Medication Storage Room revealed four expired bottles of docusate sodium that had not been properly disposed of. Medications intended for oral, rectal, and external use were found stored together on the same shelf, contrary to facility policy, which requires separation of oral and external medications. Facility staff, including the RN and DON, acknowledged these deficiencies during interviews. No specific residents or patient conditions were mentioned in relation to these findings.
Failure to Follow Menus, Recipes, and Physician Diet Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that menus were followed and that residents received meals in accordance with physician orders and established recipes. During observation, a staff member did not follow the recipe for preparing pureed egg rolls and cream of rice, including not measuring ingredients and not following the correct sequence of preparation. The staff member acknowledged confusion and confirmed that the recipes were not followed as required. Additionally, several residents were not served the correct diet texture as ordered by their physicians. Five residents who were supposed to receive regular textured diets were instead served chopped textured food due to insufficient preparation of the regular textured Beef and Broccoli stir fry. This was confirmed by both the cook and the dietary resource, who stated there was not enough food prepared to meet the residents' prescribed dietary needs. Medical record reviews confirmed that these residents had specific physician orders for regular texture diets. Portion sizes were also not adhered to, as one resident received a smaller portion of Beef and Broccoli than ordered because the kitchen ran out of food. Another resident, who was supposed to receive a small portion of rice, was served using the wrong scoop size. Staff interviews confirmed that meal cards were not properly checked to ensure correct portion sizes were served. These failures were acknowledged by the staff and administration during the survey.
Incomplete Medical Record Documentation for Advance Directives and IV Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for two residents. For one resident, the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form did not document whether the resident had formulated an advance directive or if this was discussed with the resident or their legally recognized decision maker. The form was later updated by the Social Services Director (SSD), but there was no documentation showing that the update was communicated to the resident's physician prior to the modification. The resident had a moderately impaired cognitive status, as indicated by a BIMS score of 9. For another resident, there was a lack of documented evidence that the peripheral IV site was monitored for complications or signs of infiltration during the administration of intravenous vancomycin for a wound infection. The resident was unable to recall details about the IV site, and the registered nurse confirmed that there was no documentation of IV site monitoring in the medical record. Both deficiencies were acknowledged by facility leadership during interviews.
Failure to Include Hospice Team in Interdisciplinary Care Planning
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure collaborative care planning between hospice and facility staff for a resident receiving hospice services, as required by both facility policy and the hospice contract agreement. According to the facility's policy, a coordinated plan of care involving the facility, hospice agency, and resident/family should be developed, with the hospice agency retaining overall professional management responsibility. The hospice services agreement also specifies that a registered nurse from the hospice agency is responsible for participating in interdisciplinary team (IDT) meetings. For one resident under hospice care, medical record review revealed that there was no documented evidence of hospice team participation in the IDT meeting following a significant change in the resident's condition. The resident was cognitively moderately impaired and had been admitted under hospice care. Interviews with facility staff, including the Infection Preventionist (IP), DON, and Administrator, confirmed that the hospice team was not included in the IDT meeting, despite their ongoing involvement in the resident's care.
Failure to Follow Hand Hygiene and Infection Control Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were followed by staff, as evidenced by multiple observed incidents of non-compliance with hand hygiene protocols. An occupational therapy assistant (OTA) was observed assisting a resident to the bathroom, removing gloves, and then handling clean items and donning new gloves without performing hand hygiene. The OTA acknowledged not washing hands after glove removal, which was contrary to the facility's hand hygiene policy. Additionally, a licensed vocational nurse (LVN 1) was observed during medication administration for two residents, failing to perform hand hygiene before and after taking blood pressure, during medication preparation and administration, and between medication administrations for different residents. Another LVN (LVN 7) was observed assisting two residents with oxygen therapy, moving between them without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene. Both LVNs confirmed the observations and recognized the lapses in infection control. The facility's policies require hand hygiene before and after resident contact and after glove removal, but these were not followed during the observed events.
Failure to Maintain Kitchen Equipment and Temperature Monitoring
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain essential kitchen equipment in a clean and safe operating condition, as evidenced by several observations and interviews. The ice machine was found with white flaky residue and brown buildup on both the outside panel and the base near the ice maker door. The Maintenance Director confirmed that cleaning focused only on the inside of the ice maker door and was unaware of the buildup on the exterior, despite the facility's policy requiring all equipment to be kept clean and in good repair. The low temperature dishwasher was observed with missing handle covers and brown discoloration on both handles. Additionally, chlorine levels in the dishwasher were found to be over 200 PPM, exceeding the posted reference range of 50-100 PPM. Dietary staff confirmed the excessive chlorine levels and indicated that an Ecolab technician had recently adjusted the machine, which may have caused the change. Despite this, the Dishmachine Temperature and Sanitizing Agent Log for the month showed only 100 PPM recorded for all previous checks, suggesting a discrepancy between actual and documented levels. Temperature monitoring of the residents' dining room refrigerator was also not performed according to facility policy. The temperature log lacked entries for the PM shift and was missing a recorded temperature for one morning. Staff and the Registered Dietitian verified that evening shift temperatures were not being recorded as required. These failures were acknowledged by facility leadership during the survey.
Failure to Ensure Dignity and Timely Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to treat a resident with dignity during the removal of an indwelling urinary Foley catheter. The staff did not obtain permission from the resident for multiple staff members to be present during the procedure, which included two male and one female staff. The resident expressed feeling upset, embarrassed, and violated by the presence of multiple staff members, particularly male staff, during the procedure. Interviews with the staff involved confirmed that permission was not sought from the resident for the presence of additional staff, and the Director of Staff Development acknowledged that only one licensed nurse is typically required for such a procedure. Additionally, the facility failed to administer medications to the same resident in a timely manner. The medications scheduled for 0900 hours were not administered until 1030 hours, which is beyond the one-hour window specified in the facility's policy. The resident reported not receiving her knee patch and meloxicam for pain management, which affected her ability to participate in physical therapy. The Medication Administration Record confirmed the delay in administering the medications, and the Licensed Vocational Nurse verified the late administration. The Director of Nursing was made aware of both deficiencies and acknowledged the findings. The failure to treat the resident with dignity and the delay in medication administration had the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being, as noted in the report.
Delayed Medication Administration for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely pharmaceutical services to a resident, identified as Resident 2, by not administering medications as ordered. The facility's policy requires medications to be administered within one hour of their prescribed time. However, on the day of the survey, Resident 2 did not receive her scheduled 0900 hours medications until 1030 hours, which was beyond the one-hour window. This delay was confirmed through interviews with the resident and LVN 1, as well as a review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Medication Admin Audit Report. Resident 2, who was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including muscle spasms, hypertension, multiple sclerosis, and osteoarthritis, reported not receiving her knee patch and meloxicam for pain management. The delay in medication administration was further corroborated by LVN 1, who acknowledged the late administration of medications. The Director of Nursing (DON) was informed of these findings and acknowledged the deficiency.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 2,633 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 8 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Huntington Beach
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sea Cliff Healthcare Center | 0 mi | — | 24 | 0 |
| Huntington Valley Healthcare Center | 1.4 mi | — | 8 | 0 |
| Fountain Valley Post Acute | 4 mi | — | 32 | 0 |
| Mesa Verde Post Acute Care Center | 4.6 mi | — | 24 | 0 |
| Victoria Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center | 5.2 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Beachside Nursing Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.