Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Ararat Convalescent Hospital during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A high fall‑risk resident with dementia, prior rib fractures, and impaired mobility repeatedly reported pain and stated she had fallen, pointing to her right lower back and hip during morning care. A CNA notified an RN and LVN supervisor, who assessed the resident, but the RN did not believe a fall occurred due to lack of visible bruising, and no incident report or post‑fall protocol was initiated. The DON later confirmed that staff did not follow facility fall policies, which treat resident‑reported falls as falls and require post‑fall assessment, neuro checks for unwitnessed falls, incident reporting, and IDT review. The resident continued to report pain, and a later CT scan showed probable acute, nondisplaced right rib fractures, while documentation and interviews confirmed that the fall policies and required assessments were not implemented.
The facility did not report a COVID-19 outbreak involving three symptomatic residents to CDPH as required by policy and regulation. Staff interviews revealed miscommunication and lack of clarity regarding reporting responsibilities, and no documentation was provided to confirm that public health authorities were notified.
A CNA found a resident with severe cognitive impairment and high fall risk on the floor, moved her back to bed without notifying a nurse, and delayed reporting the incident for about 20 minutes. When a nurse assessed the resident, she was found to have a swollen, discolored foot and was later diagnosed with a metatarsal fracture. Facility policy required immediate nurse notification and assessment before moving any resident after a fall, which was not followed in this case.
A resident with dementia and a history of wandering was found tied to a wheelchair with a sheet by a CNA, who recorded the incident but failed to report it immediately. The resident's care plan allowed for safe wandering, but the restraint was not in line with facility policies. The delay in reporting the incident to the Administrator and DON resulted in a situation of immediate jeopardy.
The facility experienced a gastrointestinal illness outbreak due to failures in infection control practices. Staff did not consistently use PPE or perform hand hygiene, and there was a delay in reporting the outbreak to health authorities. These deficiencies contributed to the spread of the illness, affecting residents and staff.
A facility failed to ensure a call light was within reach for a resident with a history of falls and high fall risk. The resident required assistance with ADLs and had a care plan emphasizing the need for accessible call lights. On observation, the call light was found wedged and inaccessible, confirmed by multiple staff members. Facility policies required call lights to be within reach to accommodate resident needs.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment sustained an unknown injury, resulting in swelling on the left cheek. The facility failed to conduct neurological assessments or develop a care plan, as confirmed by staff interviews and a review of the resident's medical records. Facility policies required these actions for head or facial injuries, but they were not documented, potentially leading to inadequate care.
A resident's MDS assessment was found to be inaccurate as it failed to include an active diagnosis of depression, despite the resident's medical records indicating this condition. The DON confirmed that the MDS should reflect a comprehensive assessment, including medical history, but acknowledged the discrepancy could lead to a care plan mismatch.
The facility failed to properly administer oxygen therapy for two residents, as their oxygen tubing and nasal cannulas were observed on the floor, contrary to infection control standards. Both residents had significant medical conditions requiring oxygen therapy, and the facility's policy required weekly changes of oxygen equipment, which was not followed.
The facility did not ensure that three LVNs completed their annual competency assessments, relying on self-evaluation without verifying proficiency. The DON provided a skills checklist but did not confirm skill proficiency, and the facility lacked a policy for staff skills validation.
The facility failed to follow proper food labeling and storage practices. A container of sugar in the dry goods area had multiple dates without clear indication of its status, and a Styrofoam cup of Baba ghanoush in the refrigerator was unlabeled and undated. The Dietary Supervisor acknowledged that all food items should be labeled with the name and preparation date to prevent foodborne illnesses.
A resident with a history of CHF, acute respiratory failure, and COPD experienced a severe weight loss of 10.13% over three months. The facility failed to notify the physician of this significant change, as required by their policy. The DON confirmed the absence of documentation and communication regarding the weight loss, leading to delayed care and intervention.
A resident experienced a severe weight loss of 10.13% over three months, which the facility failed to report to the physician or address with a care plan. Despite the resident's diagnoses of CHF, acute respiratory failure, and COPD, the facility did not consult with a dietician or develop a care plan to mitigate the weight loss. The DON acknowledged the lack of documentation and adherence to facility policies regarding physician notification and care planning.
The facility did not meet the required minimum of 80 square feet per resident in four rooms, affecting space for residents and potentially impacting care. Despite this, observations showed adequate space for mobility and care, and no complaints were reported.
A resident with severely impaired cognition and requiring assistance for daily activities experienced an unwitnessed fall, resulting in a head laceration. The CNA on duty had informed the RN of the resident's confusion and agitation, but the RN claimed no prior notification before the fall. The facility's fall risk policy was not followed, leading to the incident.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of confusion and agitation experienced an unwitnessed fall in an LTC facility due to the lack of a Side Rail Utilization Assessment. The facility did not assess the need for bed rails, resulting in the resident sustaining injuries. Staff interviews revealed a misunderstanding of regulations regarding bed rail use, and the facility's policy requiring such assessments was not followed.
Failure to Implement Fall Response Protocol After Resident Reported Fall and Pain
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to identify, assess, and investigate a potential fall after a high fall‑risk resident reported pain and stated she had fallen. The resident had multiple right‑sided rib fractures, pneumonia, dementia, moderate cognitive impairment, used a wheelchair and walker, and required supervision and moderate assistance with ADLs. A Morse Fall Risk assessment identified the resident as high risk for falls with a score of 80 and a history of falls and overestimation of functional abilities. On the morning in question, a CNA reported the resident pointed to her right lower back and hip indicating pain during morning care. An RN and LVN supervisor assessed the resident, who again indicated pain and told the LVN supervisor she had fallen. Despite this, the RN did not believe a fall occurred because there was no visible bruising, and the DON later confirmed that no fall incident report was completed because the fall was unwitnessed and the CNA had not observed it. The facility’s own investigation summary documented that the resident had reported to multiple staff, including a CNA and therapy staff, that she had experienced a fall, and later that evening the resident reported pain while being assisted to the bathroom with a front‑wheel walker. A CT scan performed subsequently showed probable acute, nondisplaced fractures of the right 5th and 10th ribs, and progress notes documented that the resident stated she had fallen when asked about her pain. The DON acknowledged that staff did not implement the facility’s fall policies, which defined a fall as one that may be witnessed or reported by the resident or any observer and required post‑fall assessments, neurological monitoring for unwitnessed falls, incident reporting, reassessment of mobility status, and IDT review. As a result, required post‑fall assessments, 72‑hour neurological checks, incident reporting, and interdisciplinary review were not initiated when the resident first reported a fall and pain.
Failure to Report COVID-19 Outbreak to Public Health Authorities
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report a COVID-19 outbreak to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) as required by its own policy and state regulations. The outbreak involved three residents who tested positive for COVID-19 over a span of several days. Each resident had varying degrees of cognitive and physical impairment, and all were symptomatic at the time of testing. Documentation confirmed the positive test results and the presence of symptoms such as runny nose, cough, and weakness among the affected residents. Interviews with facility staff revealed confusion and miscommunication regarding the responsibility for reporting the outbreak. The Infection Preventionist (IP) believed another IP had reported the cases, while the Administrator assumed the IP had completed the notification. The Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the Department of Public Health had been notified, but was unable to provide documentation to support this claim. Another IP admitted to not knowing that reporting to CDPH was required and acknowledged that failing to report would result in a lack of outbreak support. A review of the facility's policy and procedure on communicable disease outbreaks indicated that the Administrator was responsible for reporting outbreaks to public health authorities. The policy defined an outbreak as one or more facility-acquired COVID-19 cases in a resident or three or more suspect, probable, or confirmed cases. Despite these clear guidelines, the facility did not notify CDPH of the outbreak, resulting in a failure to comply with both internal policy and regulatory requirements.
Failure to Notify Nurse and Improper Movement of Resident After Fall
Penalty
Summary
A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) failed to follow facility policy and procedure regarding the response to resident falls. Upon finding a resident with severe cognitive impairment, muscle weakness, osteoporosis, and a history of falls lying on the floor, the CNA lifted the resident and returned her to bed without notifying a licensed nurse or waiting for a nurse's assessment. The CNA did not immediately report the incident to the licensed nurse, delaying notification by approximately 20 minutes. During this time, the resident was not assessed for injuries by a licensed nurse as required by facility policy. When the licensed nurse was finally notified and assessed the resident, she found the resident in bed, shivering and shaking in pain, with a swollen and discolored left foot. Subsequent X-ray imaging confirmed an acute nondisplaced distal fourth metatarsal neck fracture, with a possible additional fracture. The resident's care plans and assessments indicated she was at high risk for falls and fractures, required maximal assistance for mobility and transfers, and was to be handled gently to prevent injury. The facility's policy and CNA job description both required immediate notification of a licensed nurse and that residents not be moved after a fall until assessed by a nurse. Interviews with staff, including the CNA, licensed nurses, and the Director of Nursing, confirmed that the CNA did not follow established procedures. The CNA admitted to moving the resident without assistance and without notifying a nurse, stating he did not observe pain at the time and did not seek help because other staff were busy. The Director of Nursing and other nursing staff emphasized that moving a resident after a fall without a nurse's assessment could worsen injuries, and that the CNA's actions were not in accordance with facility policy.
Failure to Prevent and Report Resident Restraint
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from the use of physical restraints, as required by their policy. On a specific date, a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) observed a resident tied to a wheelchair with a white sheet during her shift. Instead of immediately addressing the situation or reporting it to a licensed vocational nurse (LVN) or other facility staff, the CNA recorded a video of the incident. The CNA did not untie the resident or report the incident to the appropriate authorities until two days later, which delayed the facility's response to the abuse. The resident involved had a history of dementia, anxiety disorder, and a history of falling, and was identified as a wandering risk. The care plan for the resident included interventions to allow safe wandering and to monitor the resident's whereabouts for safety. Despite these measures, the resident was found restrained in a manner that was not in line with the facility's policies, which require a restraint-free environment unless necessary for medical treatment. The delay in reporting the incident was compounded by the CNA's failure to inform the Administrator or the Director of Nursing (DON) immediately, as required by the facility's abuse prevention policy. The Administrator was informed of the incident only after the CNA showed the video in person, which was three days after the initial observation. This delay in reporting and addressing the abuse incident resulted in a situation of immediate jeopardy, as identified by the California Department of Public Health.
Removal Plan
- Staff including but not limited to license nurses, certified nursing assistants, office staff, kitchen staff, and housekeeping staff will have in-service education regarding elder abuse, reporting abuse and the use of physical restraints, conducted by the Director of Staff Development [DSD], DON and/or Administrator. The in-services are based on facility Policies and Procedures titled Restraints, Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program, and Definitions.
- 50 out of 61 facility employees will have received in-service education regarding elder abuse, reporting abuse and the use of physical restraints.
- A posttest was created to verify staff competency on abuse and use of restraints. The post test will be given to all staff to determine understanding of in-service. Staff will be given repeat in-service on areas found to be lacking in knowledge until 100% score is received.
- Charge nurses were assigned to complete Abuse Rounds on a minimum once per shift to ensure there are no signs or symptoms of abuse or restraints. Rounds will continue once per shift for a minimum of three months.
- If a suspected abuse or improper restraint is identified charge nurse will immediately notify the Administrator and DON.
- The facility's Social Services Consultant will provide staff in-service regarding abuse.
- All charge nurses will be in-serviced on use of SOC 341 [a form used to report suspected abuse or neglect of dependent adults and elders].
- The Administrator will review facility's current Abuse Prevention Plan with DSD to develop a new yearly in-service schedule with increased abuse training. New employee Orientation abuse and neglect training will be reviewed and updated as needed during the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI).
Infection Control Failures Lead to GI Outbreak
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, leading to a gastrointestinal illness outbreak affecting 15 residents and 7 staff members. Several instances of non-compliance with infection control protocols were observed. Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) and other staff members did not consistently use personal protective equipment (PPE) or perform proper hand hygiene. For example, CNA 1 did not remove PPE before leaving an isolation room, and CNA 2 failed to use hand sanitizer between resident interactions. Additionally, a kitchen assistant was observed handling food without gloves, and a family visitor entered the facility without a mask, despite clear signage indicating the need for masks due to the outbreak. The facility's staff also failed to adhere to contact precautions. CNA 7 entered a contact isolation room without donning PPE and did not perform hand hygiene after handling a resident's food tray. Housekeeping staff did not change gloves between tasks, potentially spreading contaminants. Furthermore, CNA 4 did not wear a gown when handling a resident's food tray in a contact isolation room, and a family member visiting a resident under contact precautions did not wear a gown, as required. The facility delayed reporting the gastrointestinal outbreak to the appropriate health authorities. The Director of Nursing (DON) initially considered the cases isolated and did not report them promptly, leading to a delay in implementing control measures. The facility's policies and procedures for infection control and reporting were not followed, contributing to the spread of the outbreak. The lack of timely communication and adherence to established protocols resulted in a failure to contain the outbreak effectively.
Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility for High-Risk Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accommodate the needs of a resident with a history of falls and a high risk for falling by not ensuring the call light was within reach. The resident, who was originally admitted on October 2, 2023, and readmitted later, had diagnoses including osteoporosis, generalized muscle weakness, and a history of falling. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident required various levels of assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), including supervision or touching assistance with toileting and personal hygiene, and partial/moderate assistance with bathing and dressing. The resident's care plan, revised on January 6, 2024, and August 6, 2024, emphasized the importance of having the call light within easy reach due to the resident's poor balance and potential for falls. On November 7, 2024, during an observation and interview, it was noted that the call light cord was wedged between the resident's mattress and headboard, making it inaccessible. Multiple staff members, including a certified nurse assistant, social service director, registered nurse, licensed vocational nurse, occupational therapist, and director of nurses, confirmed that the call light should be within reach to prevent falls and ensure the resident could request assistance when needed. The facility's policies on resident rights and communication systems also stipulated that call lights should be within residents' reach to accommodate their needs and ensure prompt communication with nursing staff.
Failure to Conduct Neurological Assessments and Develop Care Plan for Resident Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for a resident who sustained an unknown injury, specifically swelling on the left cheek. Despite the resident's severe cognitive impairment and inability to understand and make decisions, the facility did not conduct neurological assessments (NA) or develop a care plan in response to the injury. The resident's medical records lacked documentation of these necessary actions, which are crucial for monitoring potential head injuries and ensuring appropriate care. Interviews with facility staff, including a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN), a Registered Nurse (RN), and the Director of Staffing Development (DSD), confirmed that NA should have been conducted for head or facial injuries, and a care plan should have been developed. The facility's policies and procedures also indicated that NA is required following falls or injuries involving head trauma, and care plans are essential for addressing residents' medical and psychosocial needs. The absence of these assessments and care planning could lead to inadequate monitoring and care for the resident.
Inaccurate MDS Assessment for a Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for a resident, which is a federally mandated assessment tool. Specifically, the MDS for a resident did not include an active diagnosis of depression, despite the resident's face sheet indicating a diagnosis of depression along with other conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic congestive heart failure. This omission was identified during a review of the resident's records, which showed that the resident lacked the capacity to understand and make decisions. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), it was confirmed that the MDS assessments should include a comprehensive evaluation of the resident, incorporating direct observation, interviews, and a review of the resident's medical history. The DON acknowledged that an inaccurate MDS could lead to a mismatch between the resident's plan of care and their actual care needs. The facility's policy requires licensed nursing staff to complete an admission assessment using the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) specified by CMS, but this was not accurately reflected in the resident's MDS.
Oxygen Therapy Administration Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to administer oxygen therapy according to accepted standards of clinical practice and its own policy for two residents. Resident 4, who was admitted with diagnoses including encephalopathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), was observed with oxygen tubing on the floor. This observation was confirmed by a licensed vocational nurse (LVN), who acknowledged that the tubing should not be on the floor due to infection control concerns. The Director of Nursing (DON) also stated that oxygen tubing should not be on the floor to prevent bacterial contamination. Similarly, Resident 20, admitted with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation and chronic congestive heart failure, was observed with both oxygen tubing and nasal cannula on the floor. This was confirmed by another LVN, who stated that the tubing should never be on the floor due to potential infection control issues. The facility's policy, dated 8/1/2014, indicated that all oxygen delivery equipment should be changed weekly and when visibly soiled, which was not adhered to in these cases.
Failure to Complete Annual Competency Assessments for LVNs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that three out of five Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) completed their annual competency assessments and evaluations, as required by the facility's assessment to determine necessary resources and services for resident care. The LVNs' employee records included an Orientation & Annual Evaluation Skills Check List, which was signed by both the employee and the Director of Nursing (DON). However, the DON admitted that the competency skills were not completed upon hire or annually, and the facility relied on self-evaluation by the nurses without verifying proficiency in the skills listed. During interviews, the DON stated that she provided the skills checklist to the nurses at the beginning of their shifts and discussed skills with those who rated themselves as somewhat experienced or not experienced. However, there was no verification of demonstrated proficiency. Additionally, the facility administrator confirmed the absence of a policy and procedure for staff skills validation and evaluation of competencies. The facility assessment, which was undated, indicated that staff competency evaluations were necessary to maintain and improve residents' well-being, but these evaluations were not effectively conducted.
Improper Food Labeling and Storage Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to proper sanitation and safe food handling practices as per their policy and procedure. During an observation, a plastic container containing sugar was found in the dry goods storage area with a label displaying three different dates, none of which indicated the received, opened, or expiration date. This lack of proper labeling could lead to confusion about the freshness and safety of the food product. Additionally, a Styrofoam cup containing Baba ghanoush was found in the refrigerator without any label indicating the contents or the date it was prepared. The Dietary Supervisor confirmed that all opened food items should be labeled with the name and preparation date to prevent foodborne illnesses. The facility's policy, dated November 1, 2014, requires that all storage products be labeled and dated, which was not followed in these instances.
Failure to Notify Physician of Significant Weight Loss
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the physician of a significant change in condition for a resident who experienced severe weight loss. The resident, who was cognitively intact and had a history of congestive heart failure, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lost 10.13% of their body weight over three months. This weight loss was not communicated to the physician as required by the facility's policy, which mandates notification for a weight change of five pounds or more within a 30-day period. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that there was no documented evidence of a nutritional assessment addressing the resident's weight loss from July to August, nor was there documentation in the progress notes indicating that the physician was notified. The facility's policy requires that such changes be documented and communicated to the physician, but this was not done, resulting in delayed necessary care and intervention for the resident.
Failure to Address Severe Weight Loss in Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to assess, evaluate, and determine the cause of severe weight loss for a resident, identified as Resident 23, who experienced an unplanned severe weight loss of 10.13% over three months. The facility did not report the severe weight loss to the physician from July to August 2024, which was necessary to determine if the weight loss was related to the resident's disease process. Additionally, the licensed staff did not consult with the dietician for an assessment or any new dietary recommendations. Resident 23 was readmitted to the facility with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Despite being cognitively intact, the resident experienced a significant weight loss of 7.72% from July to August 2024, which was not addressed in the nutritional assessment. The facility's policy required notifying the physician and conducting a nutritional assessment upon significant weight loss, but these actions were not documented. Furthermore, the facility did not develop a care plan to address Resident 23's severe weight loss in August 2024. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the lack of documentation for notifying the physician, conducting a nutritional assessment, and developing a care plan. The facility's policies outlined the need for timely physician notification, comprehensive care planning, and nutritional assessments upon changes in condition, but these were not followed in this case.
Deficiency in Resident Room Space Requirements
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide the required minimum of 80 square feet per resident in four out of twelve resident rooms, specifically Rooms 1, 3, 4, and 5. These rooms included two six-bed capacity rooms and two five-bed capacity rooms, which did not meet federal requirements for space per resident. The deficiency was identified through observation, interviews, and record reviews, revealing that the rooms measured less than the required space, with some rooms accommodating more residents than the space allowed. Despite this, the facility's administrator indicated that they intended to request a room waiver, asserting that the room sizes had not changed and that there were no complaints from residents, families, or staff regarding the room sizes. Observations conducted over several days showed that the affected rooms provided adequate space for residents to move freely and for the use of mobility aids such as wheelchairs, walkers, and canes. The rooms were equipped with beds and bedside tables, and the nursing staff was observed providing care without any apparent hindrance due to space constraints. The facility's policy, dated 2017, required resident rooms to measure at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident rooms, which was not adhered to in the identified rooms.
Inadequate Supervision Leads to Resident Fall and Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and monitoring for a resident who experienced an unwitnessed fall, resulting in a laceration on the head and above the right eye that required medical attention. The resident, admitted with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, had severely impaired cognition and required moderate to maximum assistance for daily living activities. On the night of the incident, the resident was found on the floor by a CNA after returning from a break, indicating a lack of supervision during that time. Interviews revealed that the CNA had informed the RN at the beginning of the shift that the resident was awake, confused, and agitated. However, the RN stated that she was not informed of the resident's condition prior to the fall. The facility's policy on fall risk assessment mandates adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents, which was not adhered to in this case, leading to the resident's fall and subsequent injury.
Failure to Assess Bed Rail Need Leads to Resident Fall
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to assess the medical need for the use of a bedside rail for a resident, which resulted in an unwitnessed fall. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, had severely impaired cognition and required moderate to maximum assistance for daily living activities. Despite these needs, the facility did not conduct a Side Rail Utilization Assessment during the resident's stay, which is a necessary step to determine if the use of side rails is appropriate. On the night of the incident, a CNA found the resident on the floor next to her bed with a laceration above her right eye and on her head, requiring medical attention. The CNA had been on a break and discovered the fall upon returning. The resident was known to have episodes of confusion and agitation, yet there was no care plan in place to address these behaviors. Additionally, the Fall Risk Assessment conducted after the incident was inaccurately completed, failing to reflect the resident's previous fall and predisposing conditions, which would have indicated a high risk for falls. Interviews with facility staff revealed a misunderstanding of regulations regarding the use of side rails, with some staff believing they were against regulations. The facility's policy required a Side Rail Utilization Assessment to determine the appropriateness of bed rail use, but this was not completed for the resident. The lack of assessment and care planning contributed to the resident's fall and subsequent injury.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 5,026 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 29 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Los Angeles
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solheim Senior Community | 0.1 mi | — | 17 | 0 |
| College Vista Post-acute | 0.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Glendale Adventist Medical Center Dp/snf | 0.9 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Ararat Post Acute | 1.2 mi | — | 20 | 0 |
| Glendale Post Acute Center | 1.3 mi | — | 23 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Ararat Convalescent Hospital.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.