Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Ahmc Seton Medical Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment and vascular dementia had a cellphone, documented on their belongings inventory, go missing. Despite the facility's policy requiring replacement of inventoried items, the cellphone was not replaced after staff were unable to locate it, and the Social Worker did not arrange for a replacement as required.
A resident with significant cognitive and physical impairments experienced four falls, including one resulting in multiple toe fractures, due to the facility's failure to consistently investigate fall causes, conduct required fall risk assessments, and ensure proper use and evaluation of fall prevention devices. Staff did not always implement care plan interventions, and documentation regarding the use and function of alarms was unclear or missing.
The facility did not provide written bed hold notices to four residents or their responsible parties when the residents were transferred to a hospital. Instead, notifications were either verbal or not given, and there was no documentation in the EHR to show that written notices were provided. The residents had various diagnoses, and their responsible parties reported not receiving information about bed hold rights or the option to return after hospitalization.
A resident's grievance regarding tube feeding administration was not thoroughly investigated. The facility failed to recognize that the ordered feeding rate exceeded the pump's maximum capacity, did not clarify unclear physician orders, and did not measure the actual amount of formula delivered. Staff were unaware of the pump's error rate, and the facility did not provide required follow-up or written notification to the complainant or ombudsman, resulting in unresolved concerns.
A resident assessed as high risk for pressure ulcers developed a Stage 2 ulcer due to the facility's failure to implement necessary interventions, such as timely provision of a low air loss mattress and appropriate offloading measures. The resident's condition worsened due to lack of communication and timely reporting of skin condition changes.
The facility failed to ensure that three residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. One resident experienced side effects from Haldol without a dosage reduction, another was given Citalopram without a clinical indication, and a third was administered Risperdal without a proper diagnosis. Additionally, PRN orders for Ativan lacked stop dates and specific frequencies.
Facility staff failed to treat three residents with dignity by not responding to their call lights in a timely manner. Residents reported waiting 30-45 minutes for assistance, and staff interviews confirmed that the facility had issues with staffing and timely response to call lights.
The facility failed to inform residents about the grievance process and did not ensure grievances were resolved appropriately. Seven residents were unaware of the grievance process, and one resident reported missing personal items with no satisfactory resolution provided by the facility.
The facility failed to ensure accurate MDS assessments for three residents. One resident's dental status was incorrectly recorded, another's hemodialysis treatment was not documented, and a third resident's pressure ulcers were inaccurately coded. These errors were confirmed by staff interviews and record reviews.
The facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for seven residents, leading to unmet nursing needs and goals. Issues included unfit dentures, use of medications like Lovenox and Zolpidem, undocumented use of gloves and alarms, unaddressed planned weight loss, unaddressed extreme fear, and inaccurate dialysis access documentation.
The facility failed to provide preventive treatment and services to maintain and improve ROM for four residents when the physician's order for ROM exercises was not implemented. Observations and record reviews revealed inconsistent documentation and performance of ROM exercises, leading to potential complications such as contractures.
The facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment by not properly cleaning a fixed kettle between uses and having uncovered drainage holes encrusted with food particles on prep tables. Dietary staff admitted to insufficient cleaning practices, contrary to the facility's policy.
The facility failed to provide community dining and activity areas on the 4th, 5th, and 7th floors, confining residents to their rooms for meals. Observations showed no common areas on these floors, and the shared room on the 9th floor was insufficient for the residents' needs. Interviews indicated no current plans for additional dining areas.
The facility failed to ensure a shower area was clean after use and that two window screens were properly maintained. The shower room was found with hair, empty bottles, a safety razor, an opened body wash bottle, and used gloves. Additionally, two rooms had missing window screens, which the RN acknowledged and stated would be fixed by maintenance.
The facility failed to act on the pharmacy consultant's recommendation regarding the use of psychotropic medication for a resident with mood disorder and major depressive disorder. Despite identified irregularities in the medication regimen review, no corrective action was taken by the physician or nursing staff, potentially exposing the resident to unnecessary medications and adverse health consequences.
The facility failed to maintain accurate records for three residents, leading to potential mismanagement of their care. Staff did not accurately document fluid intake for a resident with unplanned weight loss and another on fluid restriction. Additionally, the target behavior for a resident with bipolar disorder was incorrectly documented.
The facility failed to document vaccine education and follow-up for two residents, resulting in missing records of pneumovax vaccine administration, refusal, and education. An RN confirmed the absence of this information during a review.
The facility failed to document COVID-19 vaccine education and follow-up or refusals for two residents. One resident had no documentation of COVID-19 vaccine administration, refusal, or education, while another had no documentation for both COVID-19 and pneumovax vaccines. An RN confirmed the missing information during a record review.
An emergency cart's red plastic lock tag did not match the log book entry, and the facility's policy failed to address the responsibility of floor staff in documenting these checks, potentially compromising emergency readiness.
The facility failed to have a secure handrail in their corridor. During an initial tour, a handrail outside a room was found not secured properly to the wall. This observation was confirmed with an RN, who stated she would inform maintenance. The lack of a secure handrail did not ensure residents who relied on handrails for mobility and/or support would be safe from a fall.
Failure to Safeguard and Replace Resident's Personal Property
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to safeguard the personal property of a resident with moderate cognitive impairment and vascular dementia, resulting in the loss of the resident's cellphone. The cellphone, which was documented on the resident's belongings inventory at admission, was discovered missing during routine rounds. Staff searched the resident's closet, bag, drawer, and dresser but were unable to locate the cellphone. The loss was reported to the police and appropriate state agencies, and the value of the cellphone was confirmed by the resident's former student. Despite the facility's Theft and Loss Policy, which requires the Social Worker to arrange for replacement of missing items listed in the inventory, the resident's cellphone was not replaced. Interviews with the Director of Nursing and the Social Worker confirmed that the missing cellphone was documented in the inventory, but no replacement was provided. The facility's policy and procedure on theft and loss specifically state that the Social Worker is responsible for arranging replacement if needed, but this step was not taken in this case.
Failure to Implement and Evaluate Fall Prevention Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a safe environment and adequate supervision to prevent accidents, specifically in the implementation of its fall prevention program for a resident with multiple risk factors. The facility did not consistently conduct thorough investigations into the primary causes of the resident's falls, nor did it perform fall risk assessments after two of the resident's falls, as required by facility policy. Documentation was unclear or lacking regarding whether fall prevention devices, such as tab alarms and bed alarms, were properly applied or functioning at the time of the falls. Staff also did not consistently implement care plan interventions, such as ensuring alarms were in place and activated. The resident involved had significant cognitive and physical impairments, including dementia, Parkinson's disease, depression, anxiety, osteoarthritis, and movement disorders. She required substantial to maximal assistance with transfers and toileting and had no voluntary control over bowel and bladder functions. Despite being assessed as high risk for falls, the resident experienced four falls within a four-month period, one of which resulted in fractures to all five toes on her right foot. Observations and interviews revealed that the resident was able to unclip her tab alarm unassisted, and staff were aware of this but did not evaluate or implement alternative interventions. Interdisciplinary team (IDT) notes and interviews with facility leadership indicated that post-fall huddles and investigations were inconsistently documented and did not always address whether alarms were used or functioning. In some cases, staff presumed the cause of the fall without direct evidence, and there was no documentation of reminders to staff regarding the application of alarms. The facility's own policy required fall risk assessments after each fall, but these were not completed for at least two incidents. Only one root cause analysis was conducted for the resident's falls, despite multiple incidents.
Failure to Provide Written Bed Hold Notices During Hospital Transfers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide written notice of bed hold rights to four sampled residents or their responsible parties at the time of transfer to an acute care hospital. In each case, interviews and record reviews confirmed that neither the residents nor their responsible parties received the required written notification regarding the option to request a bed hold during hospitalization or therapeutic leave. Instead, notifications were either given verbally or not at all, and there was no documentation in the electronic health records to indicate that written notices had been provided. The residents involved had various medical conditions, including encephalopathy, urinary tract infection, femoral neck fracture, congestive heart failure, hypertensive heart disease, and acute bronchitis. Responsible parties for these residents reported not receiving any written bed hold notices and were unaware of their rights regarding bed holds and the possibility of returning to the facility after hospitalization. Facility staff interviews further confirmed the absence of written notifications and revealed that the process for providing such notices was inconsistent and not documented as required by facility policy.
Failure to Thoroughly Investigate Tube Feeding Grievance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate a grievance regarding the administration of tube feeding formula for a resident who was ordered to receive 325 ml of formula within one hour at four specified times daily. The investigation did not consider the maximum rate of the facility's tube feeding pumps, which was 295 ml/hr, making it impossible to deliver the ordered amount within the specified time using the pump alone. Additionally, the facility did not identify that the physician's order was unclear and unachievable with the available equipment, nor did staff question or clarify the order despite its impracticality. During the investigation, staff did not measure the total amount of tube feeding in the enclosed bag before and after feedings, nor did they verify the amount of formula remaining after the third feeding session. This omission made it difficult to determine if the resident was receiving the prescribed amount. Observations confirmed that after three feedings, significantly more formula remained in the bag than expected, indicating the resident was not receiving the full ordered amount. Furthermore, staff were unaware that the tube feeding pumps had a plus/minus 10% error rate, which could result in under-delivery of the formula. The facility unilaterally declared the grievance resolved without providing follow-up or written notification to the complainant or ombudsman, as required by their own grievance policy. Documentation confirming communication of the investigation's outcome to the complainant and ombudsman was not provided. The lack of a thorough investigation and failure to address the complainant's concerns led to the issue being escalated to the state health department.
Failure to Prevent Pressure Ulcer Development
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prevent the development of an avoidable pressure ulcer for a resident (Resident 22) who was assessed as high risk for pressure ulcers. Despite being identified as needing extensive assistance with bed mobility and being incontinent, the resident did not have appropriate interventions implemented to prevent skin breakdown. Observations revealed that the resident was often found lying in bed without any device to offload pressure from the coccyx, which is a critical measure to prevent pressure ulcers. The resident developed a Stage 2 pressure ulcer on the coccyx, which was first observed on 8/2/23 and continued to worsen over time due to the lack of appropriate interventions, such as the timely provision of a low air loss (LAL) mattress that was ordered but not delivered promptly. The wound management detail reports indicated a decline in the wound's healing status, with measurements showing an increase in the size of the ulcer and signs of maceration due to prolonged exposure to moisture. The facility's failure to implement the necessary interventions, such as the use of a therapeutic support surface and offloading measures, contributed to the resident's condition worsening. Interviews with nursing staff revealed that there was a lack of communication and timely reporting of changes in the resident's skin condition, which could have prevented the progression of the pressure ulcer. The care plan for the resident included goals and approaches to prevent skin breakdown, but these were not effectively executed, leading to the development and worsening of the pressure ulcer.
Failure to Ensure Residents Were Free from Unnecessary Psychotropic Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that three residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. Resident 409 experienced side effects from the use of Haldol, an antipsychotic drug, and the facility did not lower the dosage for 96 days after side effects were identified. The resident's aggressive behaviors were linked to smoking restrictions, but non-medication interventions were not adequately implemented. Additionally, the resident was not started on Ingrezza, a medication to counteract Haldol's side effects, until much later, despite the recommendation to lower the Haldol dosage while waiting for approval for Ingrezza. Resident 70 was administered Citalopram, an antidepressant, without a clinical indication for its use. The resident's records did not show a diagnosis of depression, and the medication was administered continuously without proper justification. Furthermore, the PRN order for Ativan, a medication used to treat anxiety, did not have a stop date, which is against the recommended practice for psychotropic medications. Resident 86 was given Risperdal, an antipsychotic medication, without a proper clinical indication. The resident's records indicated diagnoses of stroke and depression, but not a psychotic disorder. Additionally, the PRN order for Ativan did not have a specific frequency and duration, which was identified as an irregularity by the pharmacist but remained uncorrected by the physician.
Failure to Respond to Call Lights in a Timely Manner
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to treat three out of 24 sampled residents with dignity by not responding to their call lights in a timely manner. Resident 6, who had multiple diagnoses including respiratory failure, obesity, kidney failure leading to dialysis, and a wound near the tailbone, had to wait up to 45 minutes for assistance after having a bowel movement. His responsible party reported that staff cited being short-staffed as the reason for the delay. Resident 408, who had diagnoses including paraplegia, depression, respiratory problems, anxiety, chronic pain, and arthritis, also reported waiting 30-45 minutes for assistance and felt that newly transferred residents were treated like second-class citizens. Resident 82, with diagnoses including cancer, malnutrition, breathing problems, and a stomach feeding tube, reported waiting 5-35 minutes for staff to respond to his call light. Interviews with direct care staff confirmed that the facility had issues with staffing and timely response to call lights. A CNA reported that the facility was often short at least three CNAs. An RN stated that the facility was sometimes short of CNAs and LVNs, sometimes by one or two staff members. Another RN mentioned that the facility was usually short of direct care staff two to three days a week. These staffing shortages contributed to the delays in responding to residents' call lights, thereby failing to ensure that residents were treated with dignity and respect.
Failure to Inform Residents About Grievance Process and Resolve Grievances
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to inform residents about the grievance process and did not ensure that grievances were resolved appropriately. During a resident council meeting, seven residents stated they were unaware of the facility's grievance process. Additionally, Resident 408 reported missing personal items during her transfer to the facility. The facility claimed that the resident's friend had the missing belongings, but the friend confirmed she only had limited possession of the items. The Director of Nursing (DON) was aware of the issue and filed a Theft & Loss Report but failed to provide proof of follow-up with the resident or her friend to confirm the resolution. The facility's grievance policy, revised in October 2023, requires informing residents of the resolution to ensure their satisfaction. However, the DON was unable to provide evidence that the grievance process was completed or that Resident 408 was satisfied with the resolution. This failure to inform residents about the grievance process and to follow through on grievance resolutions did not ensure that residents' concerns were addressed in a timely and appropriate manner.
Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate assessments for three of 24 sampled residents. Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dental assessment was inaccurate. During an observation, Resident 4's dentures were seen in a denture cup, and the resident mentioned difficulty chewing with them. The MDS for Resident 4 did not indicate the presence of dentures, which was confirmed by the Social Worker and Director of Nursing, who acknowledged a history of MDS discrepancies in the facility. The facility had stopped reauditing MDS assessments for the past six months due to relocation. Resident 6's MDS assessment inaccurately indicated that he was not on hemodialysis, despite his care plan showing a dialysis care plan initiated earlier. The MDS nurse confirmed the error and stated that a corrected MDS would be uploaded. For Resident 13, the MDS inaccurately recorded three pressure ulcers when there was only one. The MDS nurse admitted the coding error and was unable to explain why the sacral wound was identified incorrectly. These inaccuracies in the MDS assessments could potentially harm the residents by not providing the necessary care and services to maintain their highest level of functioning.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for seven residents, leading to unmet nursing needs and goals. Resident 4 experienced pain due to unfit dentures, which was reported to the nursing staff but not included in the care plan. Similarly, Resident 7's use of the blood-thinning medication Lovenox was not care planned until months after the medication was prescribed. Resident 70's use of Zolpidem for insomnia was also not included in the care plan until several months after the medication was ordered. Resident 78's care plan did not reflect the use of gloves to prevent self-scratching or the use of tab and bed alarms for fall prevention, despite these interventions being in place. Resident 38's planned weight loss was not documented in the care plan, even though the resident's weight had been gradually decreasing. Additionally, Resident 407's care plan did not address the specific target behavior of extreme fear for which Seroquel was prescribed. Finally, Resident 6's dialysis care plan inaccurately documented the dialysis access site, conflicting with other medical records that indicated the correct site. These deficiencies were identified through observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted by the surveyors, highlighting the facility's failure to develop individualized, person-centered care plans for the residents involved.
Failure to Implement Physician-Ordered ROM Exercises
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide preventive treatment and services to maintain and improve range of motion (ROM) for four residents when the physician's order for ROM exercises was not implemented. Resident 12, who had diagnoses including dementia, stroke, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis, was observed with contracted lower extremities. The resident's records indicated that ROM exercises were ordered but not consistently documented or performed. Similarly, Resident 22, with severe cognitive impairment and hemiplegia, had an order for ROM exercises that was not consistently followed, as evidenced by incomplete documentation over several months. Resident 38, diagnosed with quadriplegia and stroke, was observed with contractures on both arms. The resident's care plan included ROM exercises, but documentation showed that these exercises were not performed consistently. Interviews with staff confirmed that ROM exercises were often not documented, indicating they were likely not performed. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that the facility lacked a dedicated Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) program, and all Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) were responsible for performing ROM exercises. Resident 14, who had multiple diagnoses including heart problems, high blood pressure, stroke, and paralysis, also had orders for ROM exercises that were not consistently documented. The DON confirmed that the standard practice was to document all ROM exercises, and any omissions in documentation indicated that the exercises were not performed. The facility's policy on ROM exercises emphasized the importance of these exercises in preventing contractures and maintaining muscle strength, but the policy was not followed consistently for the residents involved.
Sanitation Deficiency in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment by not properly cleaning one of the four fixed kettles between serving porridge and soup for lunch. During a kitchen observation, it was noted that only one of the four large built-in cooking kettles was functioning, and it was not adequately cleaned between uses. Additionally, two kitchen prep tables had uncovered drainage holes encrusted with dried, unidentifiable food particles. Interviews with dietary staff revealed that the cleaning process for the kettles was insufficient, with only occasional scrubbing for 'creamier' items. The facility's policy and procedure for food service equipment safety and sanitation required kettles to be cleaned and sanitized after each use, which was not followed.
Lack of Community Dining and Activity Areas
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a community dining and activity area on the 4th, 5th, and 7th floors, resulting in residents being confined to their rooms for all meals. During observations, it was noted that there was no common area or dining room on the 7th and 5th floors. Additionally, the room on the 9th floor, which was being used for a singing activity, lacked sufficient chairs and tables and was shared by residents from the 4th, 5th, and 7th floors, leading to limited capacity, especially with residents in wheelchairs accompanied by their CNAs. Interviews with the Director of Dietary and the Director of Admin revealed that there were no current plans for installing dining areas on each floor, and the facility was awaiting insurance estimates for future plans.
Failure to Maintain Clean Shower Area and Window Screens
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a shower area was clean after use and that two window screens were properly maintained. During an initial tour with the Director of Nursing (DON), the shower room across from a specific room was found used and not cleaned, with strands of hair on the tile floor, a commode container full of empty plastic personal hygiene product bottles, a safety razor on the floor, an opened body wash bottle labeled 211A on the grab bar, and used plastic gloves in the recessed soap dish. The DON stated that staff should not leave the shower in this manner and should clean it after use. Additionally, during a tour with an RN, two rooms were found to have missing window screens, which the RN acknowledged and stated would be fixed by maintenance.
Failure to Act on Pharmacy Consultant's Recommendation for Psychotropic Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the pharmacy consultant's recommendation regarding the use of psychotropic medication for Resident 86 was acted upon. Resident 86, who was admitted with diagnoses including mood disorder and major depressive disorder, was prescribed Risperdal for mood disorder. The pharmacy consultant identified irregularities in the medication regimen review (MRR) on two occasions, noting that mood disorder is not an appropriate diagnosis for antipsychotic use and could be viewed as a chemical restraint. Despite these identified irregularities, no corrective action was taken by the physician or nursing staff. Interviews with the pharmacist and the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that the identified irregularities were communicated to the RN and the physician, but the physician did not act upon them. The DON acknowledged that the irregularities were communicated verbally and documented in the progress notes, but admitted that the physician's inaction was possibly missed. This failure had the potential to expose Resident 86 to unnecessary psychotropic medications and adverse health consequences, negatively impacting the resident's mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being.
Inaccurate Documentation of Resident Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain accurate records for three residents, leading to potential mismanagement of their care. For Resident 397, who had multiple diagnoses including diabetes and excessive unplanned weight loss, staff did not accurately document fluid intake. Interviews with direct care staff revealed that they combined meal and fluid intake in their records, contrary to the Registered Dietitian's expectations. This inaccurate documentation could affect the management of the resident's weight loss and overall health condition. For Resident 396, who had diagnoses including anxiety, depression, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder, the target behavior for bipolar disorder was incorrectly documented as delusion instead of hallucination. RN 8 acknowledged the need to revise this documentation. Additionally, Resident 25, who had conditions such as anemia, high blood pressure, kidney failure requiring dialysis, and diabetes, had inaccurate fluid intake and output records. RN 1 admitted that the intake and output records for January 2024 were not accurate, which is critical for managing the resident's fluid restriction due to dialysis.
Failure to Document Vaccine Education and Follow-Up
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that education regarding protective vaccines was documented and that follow-up and/or refusals were recorded in the medical records of two residents. Specifically, for Residents 70 and 88, there was no documentation of the administration of the pneumovax vaccine, no record of refusal, and no evidence of education provided regarding the vaccine. During a concurrent record review and interview with RN 5, it was confirmed that the necessary information was missing from the records, and RN 5 was unable to locate the missing documentation. This failure did not ensure that residents and/or their responsible parties could make informed decisions regarding vaccines, nor did it ensure that residents' healthcare choices were honored.
Failure to Document Vaccine Education and Refusals
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that education regarding the COVID-19 vaccine was documented and that follow-up and/or refusals were recorded in the medical records of two of four sampled residents. Specifically, Resident 89 had no documentation of COVID-19 vaccine administration, refusal, or education. Similarly, Resident 13 had no documentation of COVID-19 or pneumovax vaccine administration, refusal, or education. During a concurrent record review and interview with RN 5, it was confirmed that the necessary information was missing from the records, and RN 5 was unable to locate the missing documentation.
Emergency Cart Lock Tag Discrepancy
Penalty
Summary
An emergency cart's red plastic lock tag did not match the lock tag documented on the log, indicating a failure to follow procedure regarding logging lock tags. This discrepancy was observed during initial rounds and confirmed with an RN, who was unable to provide an explanation for the mismatch. The RN explained that once the cart is accessed, it is sent to central supply to be re-stocked, a new red plastic lock tag is installed, and the tag number is entered into the log book. The facility's policy on emergency crash carts, revised in March 2021, states that the carts will be checked every 30 days by pharmacy personnel, and new locks will be applied and documented. However, the policy did not address the responsibility of floor staff in documenting how the red tags are checked and logged. This gap in the policy contributed to the observed deficiency, as the emergency cart's lock tag did not match the log book entry, potentially compromising the availability of emergency devices and supplies.
Unsecured Handrail in Corridor
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to have a secure handrail in their corridor. During an initial tour on 01/29/2024 at 10:29 AM, a handrail outside room [ROOM NUMBER] was found not secured properly to the wall. This observation was confirmed with RN 6, who stated she would inform maintenance. The lack of a secure handrail did not ensure residents who relied on handrails for mobility and/or support would be safe from a fall.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 520 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Daly City
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Golden Heights Healthcare | 0.8 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Golden Pavilion Healthcare | 0.8 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| San Francisco Post Acute | 2.2 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Pacifica Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 2.4 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Jewish Home & Rehab Center D/p Snf | 3.9 mi | — | 16 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Ahmc Seton Medical Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.