Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Yuma Nursing Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with cognitive impairment was slapped by another resident in a common area, despite staff presence. The incident involved a resident with Parkinson's and Dementia being slapped by a peer who was significantly cognitively impaired. Staff interviews confirmed the event, and the facility's abuse prevention policy was reviewed, indicating a failure to protect residents from peer abuse.
A resident with Alzheimer's was struck by another resident with dementia in a memory care unit. The aggressive resident had a history of belligerence and was refusing medications. Despite being sent to the ER earlier, the resident returned and continued to pose a threat, leading to the incident. The facility's abuse prevention measures failed to prevent this altercation.
Failure to Protect Resident from Peer Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from abuse by another resident, resulting in a deficiency. Resident #4, who has Parkinson's Disease, Dementia, and unsteadiness on feet, was moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 12. On December 1, 2024, a progress note indicated that Resident #4 was slapped on the right forearm by Resident #5, who was significantly cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 4. The incident occurred in the common area where Resident #4 was crying, and Resident #5 approached and slapped her, telling her to stop crying. Both residents were separated, and no injuries were reported. Interviews with staff confirmed the incident, with CNAs present at the time stating that Resident #5 appeared agitated and slapped Resident #4 without any apparent triggers. The facility's policy on abuse prevention was reviewed, which mandates protecting residents from abuse by others. Despite the policy, the incident occurred, highlighting a failure to ensure the safety and protection of residents from abuse by peers.
Failure to Prevent Resident-to-Resident Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from abuse by another resident, resulting in a deficiency. Resident #12, who has Alzheimer's disease and a moderate cognitive impairment, was struck on the cheek by another resident, #87, who has dementia and significant cognitive impairment. The incident occurred in the hallway of the memory care unit, where Resident #87, who had been aggressive and belligerent throughout the day, slapped Resident #12 when she got too close. This altercation was witnessed by a CNA, who reported the incident to the Director of Nursing (DON) and other staff members. The facility's documentation and staff interviews revealed that Resident #87 had a history of aggressive behavior and had been refusing medications on the day of the incident. Despite being sent to the emergency room earlier in the day due to a physical altercation, Resident #87 was returned to the facility and continued to pose a threat to others. The facility's abuse prevention program states that abuse by residents is not tolerated, yet the measures in place failed to prevent this incident. The staff was aware of Resident #87's aggressive tendencies but did not effectively prevent the altercation with Resident #12.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 12 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Yuma
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Life Care Center Of Yuma | 0.1 mi | — | 6 | 0 |
| Welbrook Yuma Opco Llc | 0.4 mi | — | 5 | 0 |
| Haven Of Sandpointe, Llc | 0.7 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Haven Of Yuma | 1.2 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Arizona State Veteran Home - Yuma | 7.1 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Yuma Nursing Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.