Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around January 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Springdale Health And Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to properly date and discard open and expired food items, and did not adhere to hand hygiene protocols when handling raw and cooked food. These deficiencies in food storage and handling practices posed a risk of foodborne illness to residents.
The facility failed to maintain resident dignity during meal assistance, as staff were observed standing over two residents with severe cognitive impairments while feeding them. This action was contrary to the principles of resident dignity, as acknowledged by the staff themselves. The facility lacked a specific policy for dining assistance, contributing to this oversight.
The facility failed to maintain a clean and safe environment for three residents, leading to deficiencies in their living conditions. A resident's bathroom had cleanliness issues and a hazardous metal strip, while another resident's room had damaged walls. A third resident's bathroom also had cleanliness issues and a dangerous metal strip. Despite some cleaning efforts, hazards remained, and maintenance acknowledged the need for repairs.
The facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices during meal service, tracheostomy care, and perineal care. A nursing assistant picked up food from the floor and assisted a resident without hand hygiene. An LPN did not follow aseptic technique during tracheostomy care, failing to clean the site or change gloves between tasks. Additionally, two nursing assistants did not use required PPE or perform hand hygiene during perineal care for a resident on enhanced barrier precautions.
Deficiencies in Food Storage and Hand Hygiene Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to proper food storage and handling procedures, as observed during a survey. Open food items in the refrigerator were not dated, and spoiled fruit was not promptly discarded. Additionally, a beverage labeled with a staff member's name was improperly stored in the walk-in refrigerator, and expired food items were not removed by their expiration date, posing a risk of being served to residents. These actions were contrary to the facility's dietary service policy, which mandates that open food items should be covered, labeled, and dated to prevent foodborne illnesses. Furthermore, the facility did not follow sanitary procedures, particularly hand hygiene, when handling raw and cooked food. An observation revealed that a dietary staff member cracked raw eggs and then handled cooked food without washing hands, leading to potential cross-contamination. The dietary manager acknowledged the breach in protocol, noting the danger of cross-contamination and the risk of spreading bacteria such as salmonella. This lack of adherence to hand hygiene guidelines was a significant deficiency in the facility's infection prevention practices.
Failure to Maintain Resident Dignity During Meal Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that staff provided dining assistance to residents in a manner that respected their dignity. During meal service, two residents, both with severe cognitive impairments, were observed being assisted by staff who stood over them while feeding. This action was contrary to the principles of resident dignity, as it made the residents feel inferior and disrespected. The facility did not have a specific policy for dining assistance, which contributed to this oversight. Resident #12, diagnosed with frontal neurocognitive disorder and other conditions, required partial to moderate assistance with eating. Similarly, Resident #60, with a history of myocardial infarction and dementia, required setup or clean-up assistance during meals. Despite these needs, staff members were observed standing over the residents while assisting them with meals, which was acknowledged by the staff themselves as disrespectful. Interviews with staff confirmed that proper dining assistance should involve being at the same level as the residents to maintain their dignity.
Facility Fails to Maintain Safe and Clean Environment for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a clean and safe environment for three residents, leading to deficiencies in their living conditions. Resident #13's bathroom was observed to have cleanliness issues, including dark brown substances on the grout and door frame, and a metal transition strip with sharp edges that posed a safety hazard. The resident, who has arthritis and a history of falling, requires assistance with standing and toilet transfers, making these environmental hazards particularly concerning. Despite some cleaning efforts, the door frame's condition remained problematic. Resident #26's room had two large damaged areas on the walls with missing paint, which were present when the resident moved in. The resident is cognitively intact, as indicated by a BIMS score of 14. In Resident #51's room, similar cleanliness issues were noted, with a dark brown substance in the bathroom grout and a protruding metal transition strip with sharp edges. The resident, who has severe cognitive impairment and requires assistance with toileting, had previously reported these issues to maintenance. The Maintenance Director acknowledged the hazards, noting that the strip should be flat to the ground and the door frame might need replacement.
Infection Control Deficiencies in Meal Service and Resident Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain proper infection prevention and control practices during meal service, tracheostomy care, and perineal care. During meal service, a nursing assistant was observed picking up food from the floor and placing it on a resident's napkin without performing hand hygiene. The same nursing assistant also touched his face and mouth without sanitizing his hands before assisting the resident with a beverage. This occurred despite the facility's policy requiring hand hygiene after touching unsanitary surfaces or one's face. In another incident, a licensed practical nurse failed to follow aseptic technique during tracheostomy care for a resident. The nurse did not clean the tracheostomy site or change gloves between handling soiled and clean items, which is contrary to the facility's policy on tracheostomy care. The nurse admitted to not sanitizing or changing gloves, which could lead to contamination and infection. Additionally, during perineal care for a resident on enhanced barrier precautions, two nursing assistants did not use the required personal protective equipment, such as gowns, and failed to perform hand hygiene or change gloves between dirty and clean tasks. This was against the facility's policy for enhanced barrier precautions, which mandates the use of gowns and gloves during high-contact care activities to prevent infection.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 38 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Springdale
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Westwood Health And Rehab, Inc | 1 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Windcrest Health And Rehab Inc | 2.1 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| The Maples At Har-ber Meadows | 2.4 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| Shiloh Nursing And Rehab, Llc | 2.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Edgewood Health And Rehab | 3.4 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Springdale Health And Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.