Failure to Timely Report and Accurately Investigate Alleged Theft and Abuse Involving a Resident’s Ring
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to implement its abuse, neglect, and misappropriation policies and to timely and accurately report a reasonable suspicion of a crime and the findings of its investigation to the State Agency (SA) and law enforcement, as required by Section 1150B of the Act. A cognitively impaired resident (BIMS 5/15), dependent on staff for all ADLs and under hospice care, reported that someone entered her darkened room with their face covered, turned off the lights, and removed her wedding ring from her finger while she yelled for help. The activity assistant who first heard the allegation immediately informed the LPN, but did not notify the Administrator/Abuse Coordinator directly, despite facility policy requiring staff to report any incident or suspicion of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property to the Executive Director (Administrator) or, in their absence, the DON immediately. After being informed by the activity assistant, the LPN chose to search the resident’s room and contact the resident’s daughter to ask if she had the ring, instead of immediately reporting the allegation of theft and possible abuse to the Abuse Coordinator and authorities. The LPN did not inform the daughter of the resident’s allegation that someone had stolen the ring off her finger. The LPN later notified the DON and Administrator of the resident’s report that someone with a covered face took the ring in the dark room, but the DON directed the nurse to continue searching the room because of the resident’s cognitive state, to make sure the resident was not hallucinating or dreaming. The Administrator stated that, even after being informed that the resident said someone took the ring off her hand, they initially thought the ring was lost and therefore did not promptly notify the SA or law enforcement as required. The Administrator also acknowledged that the daughter, not the facility, contacted the police, and that they did not consider the situation to be of much concern initially. The facility’s internal documentation and reporting to the SA were incomplete and inaccurate. The initial report to the SA noted a missing ring and that authorities were notified, but omitted the resident’s detailed allegation that someone entered her dark room with their face covered and removed the ring from her finger while she yelled for help. A skin assessment completed on the date of the incident documented no abnormal findings and contained no photos of the resident’s hand, despite the daughter later providing photos to the SA showing a dark maroon/purple bruise on the dorsal aspect of the resident’s left ring finger, and a physician note a few days later documenting bruising of that finger. The Administrator’s investigation summary submitted to the SA did not include the allegation details or the bruising, and the Administrator could not explain the omission. Additionally, although the Administrator reported to the SA that a psychosocial assessment had been completed, the medical record contained no psychosocial or social work assessments for the resident in the month of the incident or the following month, and the social worker confirmed that no formal psychosocial assessment (such as PHQ-9) was performed. These actions and omissions demonstrate the facility’s failure to follow its abuse/misappropriation policy and to report the allegation and investigation findings accurately and within the required time frames. The resident’s daughter reported that she was first contacted by a nurse asking if she had the ring and that she was not informed by staff that her mother had alleged someone stole the ring off her finger; she only learned of the allegation directly from the resident upon arriving at the facility. The daughter stated that the LPN heard the resident’s allegation in the doorway and said they were going to report it to the nurse manager, but no one returned to follow up, leading the daughter to call the police herself. The police later informed the daughter that the ring had been found at a pawn shop and that the identification used to pawn the ring matched that of a CNA who had worked at the facility on the date of the incident. The Administrator acknowledged that the case remained under police investigation. Throughout this sequence of events, the facility did not adhere to its policy requiring immediate reporting of suspected abuse or misappropriation to the Executive Director or DON, nor did it ensure timely, complete, and accurate reporting to the SA and law enforcement as required by regulation and facility policy.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release June 24, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.



