Failure to Prevent Resident-to-Resident Sexual Abuse of Cognitively Impaired Residents
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to protect multiple residents from sexual abuse and inappropriate sexual contact by other residents. One male resident with dementia and documented behavioral problems (R5) had a history of grabbing female staff and residents and was known by staff to "love to reach for female body parts" and to grab female breasts and buttocks. On one occasion in the dining room, a dietary aide (V15) heard a female resident (R6) yelling and observed R5 with his hand on R6’s right thigh; as R6 was being moved away, R5 reached toward her chest and R6 pushed his hand away. R6, who had multiple medical conditions including depression, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, and a cognitive communication deficit, was moderately cognitively impaired and used a wheelchair. Her care plan addressed ADL self-care deficits but did not address abuse. R5 did not respond when questioned about the incident, and staff and resident interviews did not yield additional witnesses to the breast contact, but the facility was aware of his pattern of sexually inappropriate touching. In a separate incident, another cognitively impaired female resident (R4), diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease and dementia and identified as an elopement risk and wanderer, was found in R5’s room. A CNA (V10) entered the room and saw R5 with his hand down R4’s pants. R4 was described as severely cognitively impaired, nonverbal, and unable to report what had occurred. She used a wheelchair, had lower extremity impairment, and was known to wander into other residents’ rooms. Although her care plan identified her as an elopement risk and wanderer and noted behavior problems such as physical aggression toward staff, it did not include specific interventions to prevent her from entering high‑risk areas or rooms where she might be vulnerable to abuse. Staff reported they had been instructed to ensure no women were around R5 due to his history of touching staff and residents, yet R4 was able to enter his room and be subjected to inappropriate physical contact. Another male resident (R9), who was cognitively intact with no memory problems and used a wheelchair, was observed by a CNA (V18) with his right hand up the front of a severely cognitively impaired female resident’s (R7) shirt, fondling her breast while she sat in her wheelchair outside the dining area. R7 had diagnoses of unspecified dementia with mood disturbance, major depressive disorder, and anxiety, was severely impaired with memory problems, and required substantial assistance with ADLs. She was unable to answer questions about the incident due to cognitive dysfunction and did not understand a trauma‑informed assessment attempted by social services. Prior to this event, R9 had no documented history of sexually inappropriate behavior, and R7’s care plan did not address abuse or inappropriate resident‑to‑resident behavior. Across these events, cognitively impaired female residents who could not effectively protect themselves or report abuse were subjected to unwanted intimate touching by male residents, despite the facility’s written abuse prevention policy stating that residents must not be subjected to sexual abuse, including unwanted intimate touching of breasts or perineal areas. R5’s behavioral history also included an earlier incident in which he inappropriately touched R6’s thigh and attempted to reach her chest, and staff accounts indicated he had also grabbed another female resident (R7) on a different occasion. The facility’s abuse prevention policy, dated November 2025, states that each resident has the right to be free from abuse, including sexual abuse defined as non‑consensual sexual contact of any type, such as unwanted intimate touching of breasts or perineal areas, and that residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including other residents. Despite this policy and knowledge of certain residents’ sexually inappropriate behaviors and others’ severe cognitive impairments and wandering tendencies, the facility did not prevent these resident‑to‑resident sexual contacts from occurring.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 26, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.