Failure to Protect Cognitively Impaired Resident From Sexual Abuse by Roommate
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to protect a cognitively impaired, fully dependent resident from sexual abuse by a roommate who exhibited sexually inappropriate behavior. Resident #11 had diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, chronic kidney disease, epilepsy, unspecified mood disorder, and unspecified psychosis. A quarterly MDS identified moderately impaired cognition and total dependence on staff for all ADLs. The care plan documented impaired and declining cognitive function and impaired decision-making, with interventions focused on monitoring cognitive changes, assisting with decision-making, and providing a structured routine. Despite this vulnerability, Resident #11 was exposed to sexually inappropriate comments and behavior from the roommate, Resident #12. Resident #12 had diagnoses including dementia with agitation, adjustment disorder with anxiety and depression, and mild neurocognitive disorder. The quarterly MDS identified Resident #12 as cognitively intact and independent with bed mobility and transfers, but the care plan also noted impaired and declining cognitive function, short/long-term memory loss, and impaired decision-making. On one occasion, nursing documentation identified that Resident #12 made an inappropriate verbal request for Resident #11 to touch him/herself, with no physical contact observed. Staff pulled the privacy curtain and assessed both residents, and Resident #11 initially declined a room change. The DON later stated that an investigation was not initiated and the incident was not reported to the state agency because it was viewed as “just sexual talk” and not verbal or sexual abuse, despite the facility’s policy defining sexual abuse to include sexual harassment and coercion. A subsequent incident further demonstrated the facility’s failure to ensure freedom from abuse and to fully document and investigate alleged sexual abuse. A nurse reported finding Resident #12 sitting at the end of Resident #11’s bed, hearing Resident #12 ask if Resident #11 enjoyed last night, and observing Resident #11’s brief pulled down to the side in a way Resident #11 could not do independently. Another nurse supervisor reported that Resident #12 was observed fondling him/herself at the end of Resident #11’s bed and verbalizing sexual comments. Although Resident #11 was moved to another room for safety, the clinical records for both residents lacked documentation of the 3/1 incident beyond the room change, and the social worker was not informed of the earlier 2/25 incident until after the later event. The DON and administrator acknowledged the sexual comments and behavior but maintained that there was no touching of Resident #11 and that the events did not meet their interpretation of sexual abuse, despite facility policy defining sexual abuse as including sexual harassment and non-consensual sexual contact of any type. The facility’s own abuse prohibition policy defined verbal abuse as any oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms within a resident’s hearing, regardless of age, ability to comprehend, or disability, and defined sexual abuse as any non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident, including sexual harassment, sexual coercion, or sexual assault. Staff interviews confirmed that making a sexual statement toward another resident would be considered abuse and should be reported immediately. Nonetheless, the facility did not initiate an abuse investigation or report the initial allegation to the state agency, did not fully document the later incident in the clinical records, and did not consistently recognize the sexually inappropriate comments and behaviors toward Resident #11 as abuse under its own policy. These actions and omissions resulted in a failure to ensure that Resident #11 was free from sexual abuse by Resident #12.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release June 24, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.



