Failure to Implement Abuse Policy Leads to Resident Harm
Summary
The facility failed to implement its abuse policy effectively, leading to two separate incidents of alleged abuse involving residents. In the first incident, an Activity Director witnessed a State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) forcibly placing a resident into a tilt-in-space wheelchair and inverting the chair, causing the resident distress and fear. Despite the incident being reported to the Human Resource Manager, no immediate investigation was initiated, and the STNA continued to work in the facility, posing a risk to other residents. In the second incident, another STNA was reported to have been physically abusive to a resident during a shower, resulting in multiple bruises and fractures to the resident's wrist. The resident reported the incident to a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), who failed to escalate the allegation to leadership staff. Consequently, the STNA continued to work in the facility without any immediate investigation being conducted, further endangering the residents. Both incidents highlight a significant lapse in the facility's response to allegations of abuse, as staff members who were aware of the incidents did not follow the proper reporting protocols. The facility's failure to act promptly and remove the alleged perpetrators from the environment placed vulnerable residents at risk of further harm.
Removal Plan
- Registered Nurse #315 assessed Resident #71 for pain.
- Unit Manager #105 completed a skin check for Resident #71.
- Resident #71 had an in-person assessment completed by the nurse practitioner of the facility psych services (Psych 360).
- State tested Nursing Assistant #200 was suspended pending investigation by the Administrator/Executive Director.
- The Administrator/ED notified the local police department of the incident that had occurred between Resident #71 and STNA #200.
- ADON #100 notified Medical Director #800 of the incident with Resident #71 and STNA #200 and of the incident with Resident #78 and STNA #300.
- The ED notified the local police department of the incident that had occurred between Resident #78 and STNA #300.
- STNA #300 was suspended pending investigation by Executive Director.
- Resident #78 had an in-person assessment completed by the nurse practitioner of the facility psych services (Psych 360).
- LPN #226 reassessed Resident #78 for skin issues.
- Resident #78 had pain assessment completed by LPN #105.
- 61 residents with a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score (BIMS) score of 10 and higher were interviewed by ADON# 100, Clinical Manager #101, and RDCO #320 to identify any additional occurrences of abuse.
- Skin assessments were performed by LPN #430, ADON #100, Clinical Manager #101 and RDCO #320 on all other residents who had a BIMS under 10 or were not interviewable.
- All 102 residents were interviewed and/or assessed.
- The ED sent a text message to all 121 staff members, to notify them of required in-service education that was being completed by RDCO #320.
- The education included a quiz. Elements of the education included: Using a tilt-and-space (chair) as a restraint, dementia care, de-escalating a catastrophic reaction, abuse, securing resident safety in cases of suspected abuse, staff removing perpetrators from facility, reporting incident to supervisor immediately, phone numbers of department heads, including abuse coordinator, and proper steps/timelines in abuse investigation.
- 17 employees completed the education.
- Regional Director of Operations #750 educated HRM #600 on the policy and procedure for appropriate pre-employment checks to be completed prior to hire.
- RDCO #320 educated HRM #600 verbally via telephone on proper policies and procedures for the use of Restraints, Dementia Care, Aggressive/Combative Behavior, Abuse Policy, Abuse Reporting, and Abuse Investigation.
- HRM #600 was educated that if an employee reported abuse to her, she should first make sure the resident was safe and the perpetrator was out of the facility, and then report the incident to the facility Abuse Coordinator, who was the Administrator/Executive Director.
- Unit Manager #105 along with the interdisciplinary team were educated by RDO #750.
- Education was in-person and included a review of proper policy and procedures on the use of Restraints, Dementia Care, Aggressive/Combative Behavior, Abuse Policy, Abuse Reporting, and Abuse Investigation.
- RDCO #320 educated Unit Manger #105 on Abuse Prevention, the use of restraints, and aggressive/combative behavior with emphasis on de-escalating catastrophic reactions, abuse investigation (including resident assessments & documentation) and reporting, and use of restraints.
- RDCO #320 educated LPN #102 on abuse reporting, including the identity of the abuse coordinator, timelines, and proper notifications in instances of abuse allegations.
- Elements of these policies that were emphasized include: Using a tilt-and-space (chair) as a restraint, dementia care, de-escalating a catastrophic reaction, abuse, securing resident safety in cases of suspected abuse.
- RDCO #320 educated the DON verbally via telephone on proper policies and procedures for the use of Restraints, Dementia Care, Aggressive/Combative Behavior, Abuse Policy, Abuse Reporting, and Abuse Investigation.
- The remaining 104 staff including LPN #102 and Unit Manager #105 were educated in person or via telephone on the use of restraints, Dementia Care, Aggressive/Combative Behavior, Abuse Policy, Abuse Reporting, and Abuse Investigation by RDCO#320/designee.
- The facility indicated all new hires would be educated on the first day of orientation by social service staff.
- The facility Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee met to conduct a root cause analysis of the incidents involving Resident #78 and Resident #71.
- The QAPI committee included ED, RDO #750, RDCO #320, MD #800, and the DON via telephone.
- The QAPI committee determined the root causes of the incidents included staff working in memory care unit without proper training in Dementia Care and Aggressive/Combative Behavior, staff needed education on the Use of Restraints in terms of tilt-and-space chairs, and staff were unaware of the Abuse Coordinator, proper reporting protocols, and proper steps/requirements of abuse investigation.
- Resident #71 went to the hospital to have labs performed.
- While in the hospital, Resident #71 reported the incident of abuse to hospital staff.
- The hospital performed x-rays and found three fractures in Resident #71's right wrist.
- Resident #71 returned to facility with an order for a splint to the right wrist.
- An appointment was set for the resident to see an orthopedist.
- The DON/designees reviewed care plans for additional residents with history of catastrophic reactions.
- Resident #71's care plan was reviewed by LPN #105.
- The care plan was updated for the resident to have two staff members during showers, and no males were to provide care during all showers.
- Additionally, the residents care plan was updated related to her fracture.
- Changes were communicated to staff through the resident's Kardex in Point Click Care.
- The Administrator or designee would interview two staff and three residents once a week for four weeks to ensure that no incidents of abuse had occurred.
- The DON/designee would perform two random skin assessments daily for four weeks to ensure care is being provided appropriately.
- The DON/Designee would audit the Connections (memory care) Unit 5 days a week for four weeks.
- Audits would include observation of activity of daily living assistance and meal service to ensure residents were receiving proper care.
- The ED/designee would audit HR once a week for four weeks to ensure new hires were properly screened with BCI checks and reference checks.
- Audits would also ensure new hires were properly signed up for Relias for in-service training and receive proper abuse and dementia care training upon hire.
- The ED/designee would audit employee evaluations once a week for four weeks to ensure any issues mentioned in employee evaluations were followed with proper education or discipline by DON/designee.
- RDCO #320/designee would audit 24-hour reports daily for four weeks to see if any reportable incidents occurred.
- The RDCO/designee would also audit to ensure facility Self-Report Incidents (SRIs) were reported to the State (ODH) agency portal in a timely fashion.
- The results of all audits would be submitted to QAPI committee for review upon completion and quarterly thereafter.
- STNA #300 was terminated.
- STNA #200 was terminated.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Failure to Investigate Allegation of Verbal Abuse: A volunteer reported that an activities staff member yelled at a resident during bingo and then yelled at the volunteer when she intervened. Interviews with the resident and volunteer confirmed the staff member spoke rudely and loudly to the resident, and the regional clinical director confirmed there was no evidence the verbal abuse allegation was reported or investigated.
Staff failed to remove alleged perpetrators from duty and fully investigate verbal abuse during two separate abuse allegations involving a resident and two CNAs. In the first event, a resident reported being intentionally pushed into a siderail during in-bed care, while multiple other residents described the same CNA as rough and having a bad attitude; despite this, the CNA completed the shift and worked additional days while the abuse investigation was open. In the second event, the same resident alleged that another CNA pushed his leg and made a profane, threatening statement, but the facility’s investigation did not address the verbal abuse allegation, and that CNA was also allowed to finish the shift and work subsequent days during the investigation. Timecard records and interviews with the administrator and DON confirmed that alleged perpetrators continued working with unrestricted access to residents while abuse allegations were under investigation, leading surveyors to identify immediate jeopardy and substandard quality of care.
The facility failed to investigate multiple major injuries and an allegation of sexual abuse involving three residents with severe cognitive impairment and significant medical conditions. One resident, dependent for transfers, was found on the floor after attempting to get out of bed and was later found to have bilateral femur fractures. Another resident with Parkinson’s disease was found on the floor after a wheelchair alarm sounded and was later diagnosed with a femur fracture following complaints of leg pain. A third resident, described as very independent, triggered a bed alarm and was found kneeling by a recliner, later requiring ORIF for fractures of the right 4th and 5th metacarpals. In each case, the ADM acknowledged awareness of the fractures, stated there was no belief of neglect or abuse, and confirmed that no investigation into the cause of the injuries or the alleged abuse was initiated or documented.
A resident with moderately impaired cognition and a preferred language other than English developed bilateral wrist discoloration and swelling during ADL care when a CNA reported the resident was resisting and bumped her wrists on a wheelchair. Documentation noted the injury, assessment, and treatment, but the care plan was not updated. A family member reported that the resident said staff grabbed her hand and tried to force care, and this was reported to nursing and administration. Despite this allegation, the facility did not conduct a full abuse investigation per its policy: the Social Service Director did not interview the resident or other cognitively intact residents or complete a trauma assessment, and the Administrator/DON confirmed that only the involved CNA and RN were interviewed before concluding no abuse occurred.
A resident with cognitive impairment and a history of cerebral infarction, identified as at risk for abuse, reported to an LPN that another resident punched them in the arm and showed a bruise, while other staff and the other resident described only a collision with a wheelchair and denied any hitting. The Administrator was unaware that an abuse allegation had been made, and the DON’s investigation focused on the bruise without obtaining statements from the reporting resident or the LPN, and without completing initial or final reports or determining the cause of the bruise or whether abuse occurred, in contrast to the facility’s abuse policy requiring prompt and thorough investigation of all abuse reports.
The facility failed to report the results of an abuse allegation investigation within the required five working days. An SBAR note documented that two residents in the lobby began cussing at each other while one was preparing to leave for dialysis, and that one resident punched the other on the body as she was on the gurney leaving. The Administrator confirmed that while the initial SOC 341 was sent on the date of the incident, the 5-day summary of the investigation was not sent to the state agency until several days later, exceeding the timeframe required by the facility’s abuse reporting policy.
Failure to Investigate Allegation of Verbal Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure an allegation of verbal abuse was thoroughly investigated for resident #55. A complaint/grievance form documented that a volunteer reported activities staff member #1 yelled at resident #55 during bingo after the resident called out bingo, and the volunteer stated the staff member continued yelling at the resident and then yelled at the volunteer when she intervened. The grievance also noted that two residents reported the activities staff member yelled at them all the time and spoke to them the same way during bingo. Interviews confirmed the incident involved rude and loud comments by the activities staff member toward resident #55 during bingo, including telling the resident to stop interrupting and making a smart-ass remark. Resident #55 stated the interaction upset him/her and that the staff member was later terminated. A volunteer corroborated hearing the staff member speak loudly and rudely to the resident and then yell at the volunteer. Review of the state survey agency incident database showed no evidence the allegation was reported, and the regional clinical director confirmed the facility had no evidence the verbal abuse allegation was investigated.
Failure to Remove Alleged Abusers and Investigate Verbal Abuse During Abuse Allegations
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to protect residents during investigations of two separate abuse allegations made by one resident against two CNAs and failed to investigate an allegation of verbal abuse. In the first incident, the resident alleged that a CNA pushed him over "so the fuxx hard" while cleaning him on the evening shift that his head hit the siderail and that it was done on purpose. The resident contacted 911 the evening of the incident and police responded to the facility, indicating staff were aware of the allegation that same evening. The DON assessed the resident with no injury noted. Staff interviews documented that the resident became verbally and physically abusive during care, scratched staff, and that his head "tapped" the rail but not hard or on purpose. The resident, however, told another CNA that the aide had rolled him too hard, his eye hit the rail, and his legs came out of the bed, and he repeated similar details to the DON, stating the aide came in with an attitude and rolled him extra hard. As part of the facility’s internal investigation of the first incident, 12 residents were interviewed about the CNA’s care. Several residents reported that the CNA was rough, pulled them over hard, almost threw them on the floor when turning them in bed, had a bad attitude, and one resident did not want the CNA in her room. Despite these concerns and the resident’s allegation of being intentionally pushed, the CNA was allowed to complete her shift and to work subsequent scheduled shifts while the investigation was ongoing. Timecard records showed that the CNA worked the night of the incident and additional shifts on the following days and was paid for those hours. Although a suspension notice was later dated and an involuntary termination recorded, the contemporaneous documentation and time records demonstrated that the CNA remained in the building and had access to residents during the open abuse investigation. In the second incident, the same resident alleged that another CNA verbally and physically abused him during ADL care. The resident reported that the CNA pushed his leg down harder and stated, "I want to fuck with you now," and he called 911 to report that a staff member pushed his leg. Four staff members present in the room provided statements that no one harmed him, describing that his leg was lifted to remove a pillow and dirty sheets and then set down softly, after which he began yelling, accusing the CNA of cracking his leg and hip, cursing staff, and digging his fingernails into a staff member’s arm. Police interviewed staff and concluded that no harm was done to the resident. The facility’s investigation included resident safety interviews, one of which noted a resident did not feel safe on certain shifts due to staff. However, the verbal abuse allegation (the reported statement "I want to fuck with you now") was not addressed in the facility’s investigation, and the CNA involved was allowed to complete her shift and work additional scheduled days while the investigation was in progress. The administrator later acknowledged that she did not instruct the CNA to go home and that everyone "stayed kinda together" during the investigation. These actions and inactions resulted in surveyors identifying immediate jeopardy and substandard quality of care due to residents not being protected from alleged perpetrators during abuse investigations.
Failure to Investigate Major Injuries and Alleged Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to initiate and document investigations into multiple major injuries and an allegation of sexual abuse, as required for all alleged violations involving abuse and injuries of unknown source. For one resident with hemiplegia, hemiparesis, and severely impaired cognition (BIMS score of 6), nursing notes documented that his roommate activated the call bell after the resident fell while attempting to get out of bed by himself. He was found on the floor between his bed and the window, reported knee pain with a popping sensation, and was sent to the ER. On return from the hospital, he was noted to have bilateral femur fractures, immobilizing braces on both legs, and was placed on comfort care due to bones not being strong enough for surgery. The Administrator acknowledged awareness of the bilateral femur fractures, stated he did not believe neglect or abuse caused the injury, and confirmed he did not investigate the cause of this major injury. Another resident with Parkinson’s disease and a BIMS score of 0 (rarely/never understood) was documented in an incident note as sitting in a wheelchair in the dining room when his alarm sounded; he was found supine on the floor, denied hitting his head or injury, and was assisted back into the chair with no signs of injury noted. Several days later, nursing notes recorded that CNAs reported the resident complaining of left leg pain when getting him out of bed. On assessment, he had tenderness and wincing with movement of the left leg but was able to bear weight. The MD was notified, an x-ray was ordered, and the resident was transported for imaging, which revealed a femur fracture for which surgery was not pursued. The Administrator stated he was aware of the femur fracture, did not feel neglect or abuse caused the major injury, and did not investigate the cause of the injury. A third resident with COPD, scoliosis, and severely impaired cognition (BIMS score of 7) had an incident note documenting that her bed alarm sounded and staff found her in a kneeling position leaning into her recliner after she attempted to get up from bed to go to the bathroom, stating her walker “didn't go where she was going.” She complained of left knee, left elbow, and right pinky pain, with no visible injury except an abrasion on the right ring finger. A later nursing note documented that she underwent ORIF of fractures of the right fourth and fifth metacarpals at a hospital and returned from surgery the same day. The Administrator reported being aware of the fractures, described the resident as very independent and wanting to wander the facility, stated he did not feel neglect or abuse caused the major injury, and confirmed he did not investigate the cause of the injury. Across these three residents, the facility did not initiate or document investigations into the causes of the major injuries or the related allegation of sexual abuse, nor did it determine causation or responsible parties as required.
Failure to Investigate Allegation of Abuse After Resident Wrist Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to investigate an allegation of potential abuse after a resident sustained bilateral wrist injuries during ADL care by a CNA. The resident, who had moderately impaired cognition with a BIMS score of 11 and whose preferred language was Korean, was admitted with altered mental status. On the date of the incident, an incident report documented that the CNA informed an RN that the resident developed discoloration and swelling of both wrists during clothing changes when the resident was resisting care and bumped her wrists against the wheelchair during transfer. A nurse’s note recorded similar information, stating that the resident developed bilateral wrist discoloration and swelling after an accident during clothing changes while the resident was resisting, and that ice was applied and an x-ray was ordered to rule out fracture. The resident’s care plan, which addressed discoloration, was not updated after the wrist injuries occurred. The facility did not conduct a comprehensive abuse investigation as required by its policy. The CEO acknowledged there was no investigation for the incident and only produced a grievance document. A family member reported that the resident told her staff grabbed her hand and tried to force her when she refused to be changed, and that this allegation was reported to a nurse and the prior Administrator. The Social Service Director stated that, in abuse investigations, she typically interviews the resident and five other cognitively intact residents and completes a trauma assessment, but she did not interview this resident, did not interview other residents, and did not complete a trauma assessment related to this incident. She reported that the facility held a meeting and determined abuse did not occur but was unsure how that conclusion was reached. The Administrator, who was the DON at the time, stated that after allegations of abuse they immediately start an investigation, but in this case they only interviewed the involved CNA and RN and relied on the CNA’s denial of abuse and explanation that the injury occurred during ADL care, without interviewing the resident, witnesses, or others as required by the facility’s abuse, neglect, and exploitation policy.
Failure to Thoroughly Investigate Resident’s Abuse Allegation and Unexplained Bruise
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse related to a resident with a history of cerebral infarction who was moderately cognitively impaired and used a wheelchair. The resident’s care plan identified them as being at risk for abuse and neglect. The resident reported to an LPN that another resident had punched them in the arm while they were going down the hall, and showed the LPN a light purple circular bruise on the back of the left arm, approximately two inches in diameter. The LPN notified the Administrator of the resident’s report. Other staff and the alleged perpetrator resident provided written and verbal statements describing an interaction in which the resident in question ran into the other resident’s wheelchair, and they denied seeing or performing any hitting. Despite the allegation of being hit and the presence of a bruise, the facility’s investigation did not include a statement from the resident who alleged the abuse or from the LPN who initially received the report. The Administrator stated she was not aware that the resident had made an abuse allegation and believed they were only investigating a bruise. The DON stated that she conducted interviews regarding the bruise but did not obtain a statement from the resident and acknowledged she probably should have. The investigation file lacked initial or final reports, did not determine the cause of the bruise, and did not reach a conclusion about whether the alleged abuse occurred, contrary to the facility’s abuse policy that requires immediate protection of residents and prompt, aggressive investigation of all reports and allegations of abuse.
Failure to Timely Report Abuse Investigation Results
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the results of an abuse allegation investigation were reported to the state agency within the required five working days. Resident 1, who had diagnoses including a right shoulder fracture and end-stage renal failure, was involved in an altercation documented in an SBAR note dated 4/13/26, which stated that the resident and her roommate were in the lobby, began cussing at each other while the roommate was preparing to leave for dialysis, and that when Resident 1 was on the gurney leaving, the roommate punched Resident 1 on the body. The Administrator confirmed that the initial SOC 341 report was sent on 4/13/26, but the 5-day summary of the abuse allegation investigation was not sent to CDPH until 4/21/26. This reporting timeframe did not comply with the facility’s policy titled “Reporting Alleged Violations of Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Mistreatment,” which requires that results of all investigations of alleged violations be reported within five working days of the incident. The deficiency centers on the delay between the incident date and the submission of the 5-day investigation summary, as verified through interview with the Administrator and review of the email to CDPH, demonstrating that the facility did not adhere to its own policy and the expected reporting timeframe for abuse investigation results.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 26, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.